Results 171 to 180 of about 35,690 (222)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Binaural phase differences and binaural auditory adaptation
British Journal of Audiology, 1984In order to determine the relationship between binaural phase localization and auditory adaptation, subjects were asked to perform a series of phase-based localization tasks, as well as an SDLB adaptation task. A binaurally presented 400 Hz tone was used for midplane localization tasks, and adaptation balances.
J, Bowers, W, Wolosianski, E M, Weiler
openaire +2 more sources
Binaural noise PSD estimation for binaural speech enhancement
2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2014In this paper we propose a novel binaural algorithm to estimate the power spectral density (PSD) of the background noise at the left and right ear separately. Inspired by equalization-cancelation considered in binaural hearing, the target speech is canceled at both left and right ears by means of the FLMS (fast least-mean square) algorithm.
Masoumeh Azarpour +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 1985
Binaural beats have been investigated in normal volunteers using high-stable synthesizers. There are considerable differences between the subjective rhythm heard and the difference of the two frequencies, indicating that this dissimilarity must be caused centrally.
openaire +2 more sources
Binaural beats have been investigated in normal volunteers using high-stable synthesizers. There are considerable differences between the subjective rhythm heard and the difference of the two frequencies, indicating that this dissimilarity must be caused centrally.
openaire +2 more sources
Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 1960
Binaural interaction is discussed by comparing the mon- and binaural speech audiograms. It appears to be possible to distinguish between two types of perceptive deafness. If the binaural speech audiogram is steeper (roughly by a factor 2) than the monaural curves, the deficiency is located anywhere between cochlea and superior olivary nucleus.
J J, GROEN, A C, HELLEMA
openaire +2 more sources
Binaural interaction is discussed by comparing the mon- and binaural speech audiograms. It appears to be possible to distinguish between two types of perceptive deafness. If the binaural speech audiogram is steeper (roughly by a factor 2) than the monaural curves, the deficiency is located anywhere between cochlea and superior olivary nucleus.
J J, GROEN, A C, HELLEMA
openaire +2 more sources
Experiments on Binaural Hearing
Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 1961The authors report upon comparative measurements of articulation score in monaural v. binaural stimulation of normal ears when stimulated by two narrow bands of coherent filtered speech.The results indicate that under certain conditions it is to be expected that perceptively impaired ears with sloping threshold audiograms will manifest a substantially ...
H C, HUIZING, M, TASELLAAR
openaire +2 more sources
Binaural Hearing with Digisonic SP Binaural Implant
2009Introduction: The author presents a new technique for the rehabilitation of profoundly deaf adult patients by cochlear electrical stimulation. Usually, one ear is implanted. Bilateral cochlear implantation experiences have been reported by the literature recently. The Digisonic SP Binaural is a 24 channels[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL]
Bébéar, JP, Truy, E, Romanet, P
openaire +2 more sources
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2007
A survey of data on the perception of binaurally presented sounds indicates that loudness summation across ears is less than perfect; a diotic sound is less than twice as loud as the same sound presented monaurally. The loudness model proposed by Moore et al. [J. Audio Eng. Soc.
Brian C J, Moore, Brian R, Glasberg
openaire +2 more sources
A survey of data on the perception of binaurally presented sounds indicates that loudness summation across ears is less than perfect; a diotic sound is less than twice as loud as the same sound presented monaurally. The loudness model proposed by Moore et al. [J. Audio Eng. Soc.
Brian C J, Moore, Brian R, Glasberg
openaire +2 more sources
Binaural amplitude discrimination and the binaural masking-level difference
Hearing Research, 1991Under certain conditions, amplitude discrimination is not a monotonic increasing function of signal-to-noise ratio. The non-monotonicity arises when the tones to be discriminated are presented 180 degrees out-of-phase at the observer's ears and just above their detection 'threshold' in noise that is in-phase at the observer's ears, and with 2-6-dB ...
openaire +2 more sources
Frequency dependence of binaural performance in listeners with impaired binaural hearing
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1992Binaural performance was measured as a function of stimulus frequency for four impaired listeners, each with bilaterally symmetric audiograms. The subjects had various degrees and configurations of audiometric losses: two had high-frequency, sensorineural losses; one had a flat sensorineural loss; and one had multiple sclerosis with normal audiometric ...
Janet Koehnke, H Steven Colburn
exaly +3 more sources