The Epistemic Harms of Botched Apologies for Past Wrongs
ABSTRACT Apologies often create expectations of meaningful change and repair. Yet when institutions or states deliver apologies for past wrongs that lack substantive reparative action, they risk deepening, rather than redressing, the harms they acknowledge.
Abraham Tobi
wiley +1 more source
A qualitative study of the ethical issues encountered at end-of-life care at a university teaching hospital in Nigeria. [PDF]
Udeh NN, Idemili Aronu N, Ezeome ER.
europepmc +1 more source
The Woman and the Physician Facing Abortion: The Role of Correct Science in the Formation of Conscience and the Moral Decision Making Process [PDF]
Irving, Dianne N.
core +1 more source
Applying One Health Bioethical Principles to Climate Change: The Planetary Patient Paradigm. [PDF]
Lewczak Z, Mitchell MG.
europepmc +1 more source
Consigning Injustice to History with Political Apologies
ABSTRACT Failures to remember the past properly can constitute a range of different wrongs. In this article, we identify a novel kind of wrong that often occurs through political apologies: consigning an injustice to history. Consigning acknowledges that a historical injustice took place but denies that it has any ongoing relevance for the present ...
Alfred Archer, Benjamin Matheson
wiley +1 more source
The VALUE Study: Exploring the Value of a Clinical Ethics Consultation Service at the "A. Gemelli" Hospital. [PDF]
Masilla SS +7 more
europepmc +1 more source
Dating Apps and the Right to an Explanation
ABSTRACT This article argues that in countries where dating apps have become the primary means of meeting romantic partners and promise to help users find love, individuals should be entitled to access certain information about how their algorithms function. Specifically, we advocate for a legal right to an explanation that addresses the following, not
Bouke de Vries +1 more
wiley +1 more source
Review of \u3cem\u3eThe Anticipatory Corpse: Medicine, Power, and Care for the Dying\u3c/em\u3e by Jeffrey P. Bishop [PDF]
Lysaught, M. Therese
core +1 more source
Using Affirmative Action as a Tiebreaker
ABSTRACT We argue in favor of affirmative action. There are two central points to our argument. First, if two or more candidates for a position are matched in competence, then one ought to prefer a candidate from a disadvantaged, disenfranchised, or minority background rather than defer to the outcome of a lottery.
Shalom Chalson, James Bernard Willoughby
wiley +1 more source

