Results 11 to 20 of about 383 (97)

Sulla riformulazione dei criteri CILFIT: le Conclusioni dell'A.G. Bobeknel caso Consorzio Italian Management e Catania Multiservizi [PDF]

open access: yesEuropean papers (Online. periodico), 2021
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(2), 955-965 | European Forum Insight of 9 October 2021 | (Table of Contents) I. Premessa. - II. La proposta di riformulazione dei criteri CILFIT. - III.
Francesco Liguori
exaly   +6 more sources

How to Continue a Meaningful Judicial Dialogue About EU Law? From the Conditions in the CILFIT Judgment to the Creation of a New European Legal Culture [PDF]

open access: yesUtrecht Journal of International and European Law, 2018
The aim of this article is to better understand the conditions outlined in the 'CILFIT' judgment and their role in creating a meaningful dialogue about European Union law. For these purposes two distinct views on the relation between language and meaning
Jacobien van Dorp, Pauline Phoa
exaly   +10 more sources

La cuestión prejudicial europea en evolución: necesaria motivación para omitirla e instrumentos para su efectivo planteamiento

open access: yesRevista Vasca de Administración Pública, 2023
The relevance of the question referred for a preliminary ruling was interpreted more than forty years ago by the Cilfit judgment and, although the core of such interpretation is maintained, the most recent Consorzio judgment has provided something new in
Edorta Cobreros Mendazona
doaj   +3 more sources

Cilfit en Schumacker: tijd voor nieuwe prejudiciële vragen aan het Hof van Justitie? [PDF]

open access: yesNLFiscaal Wetenschappelijk, 2023
Nationale rechters en het HvJ zijn belast met de handhaving van het EU-recht. Bestaat onduidelijkheid hoe een bepaling van EU-recht moet worden uitgelegd, dan heeft de nationale rechter de mogelijkheid - en soms de verplichting – de vraag voor te leggen aan het HvJ.
Ros, Erik; id_orcid
core   +14 more sources

How to Make a Unicorn or ‘There Never was an “Acte Clair” in EU Law’: Some Remarks about Case C-561/19 Consorzio Italian Management

open access: yesCroatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 2021
In its judgment in Consorzio Italian Management, the Court of Justice has gone some way to solving the riddle that since the beginning of European integration has remained one of the most important and widely discussed doctrines of EU law: one that ...
Davor Petrić
doaj   +2 more sources

The CILFIT Criteria Clarified and Extended for National Courts of Last Resort Under Art. 267 TFEU

open access: yesEuropean Papers, 2022
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2022 7(1), 265-274 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Context: two preliminary references and the need to prove relevance. - III. The Advocate General opinion. - IV.
Imelda Maher
doaj   +2 more sources

Obligation to Refer or to State Reasons for Non-Referral under Article 267(3) TFEU: Between Ideals and Reality, Distrust and Encouragement

open access: yesGdańskie Studia Prawnicze
Déjà vu: the CJEU rejects the Advocate General’s proposal to revisit the contested CILFIT doctrine. Instead, it confirms its position from C-152/17, Consorzio, that courts of last instance are required to provide reasons for not making a reference under ...
Mohor Fajdiga
doaj   +2 more sources

REENVIO PREJUDICIAL E TUTELA JURISDICIONAL EFETIVA NA UNIÃO EUROPEIA: LIMITES DO ACESSO DOS PARTICULARES AO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA E A CENTRALIDADE DO JUIZ NACIONAL

open access: yesCadernos Cajuína
O presente artigo examina o reenvio prejudicial como instrumento de tutela jurisdicional efetiva dos particulares na União Europeia, diante dos limites de acesso direto ao Tribunal de Justiça. Parte-se do problema de saber em que medida o artigo 267.º do
Jhonata Jankowitsch Amorim   +1 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Inter-Environnement Expanded: Another Brick Out of the Wall of EU Law Supremacy?

open access: yesEuropean Papers, 2017
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2017 2(1), 321-327 | European Forum Insight of 29 March 2017 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. The legal and factual background of the case. - III.
Giulia Gentile
doaj   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy