Results 21 to 30 of about 383 (97)

Rivedere CILFIT? Riflessioni giuscomparatistiche sulle conclusioni dell’avvocato generale Bobek nella causa Consorzio Italian management [PDF]

, 2021
In questo saggio si cercherà di contestualizzare e analizzare in maniera critica le conclusioni dell’avvocato generale Bobek al caso Consorzio Italian management, prestando particolare attenzione alle questioni che lo hanno indotto a suggerire alla Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea un parziale superamento della nota giurisprudenza CILFIT.
Leonardo Pierdominici, Giuseppe Martinico   +1 more
core   +3 more sources

Beoordeling van eventuele verplichting om prejudiciële vragen te stellen [PDF]

Het Hof van Justitie EU (grote kamer) bevestigt in de zaak Kubera de CILFIT-doctrine nog eens. De hoogste nationale rechter moet het Hof van Justitie vragen stellen over de uitlegging van het Unierecht wanneer deze niet volstrekt duidelijk ...
de Wilde, Maarten
core   +13 more sources

It Takes Two to Tango: An Introduction

European Papers, 2020
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(2), 745-754 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Evolving legal questions surrounding Art. 267 TFEU. - III. Stocktaking: the procedure under pressure? - IV.
Jasper Krommendijk
doaj   +1 more source

Irish Courts and the European Court of Justice: Explaining the Surprising Move from an Island Mentality to Enthusiastic Engagement

European Papers, 2020
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(2), 825-849 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Research design and literature overview. - III. Legal explanations. - III.1.
Jasper Krommendijk
doaj   +1 more source

Hof van Justitite van de Europese Unie te Luxemburg 6 oktober 2021 (Nr. C-561/19):BNB 2022/48

, 2022
Zaak Consorzio Italian Management. Cilfit-criteria.
Wattel, P.J.
core   +4 more sources

Si può “migliorare” CILFIT? Sulla sentenza Consorzio Italian Management [PDF]

, 2022
Da lungo tempo la dottrina si interroga sulla possibilità, se non di rinnegare, almeno di migliorare il dictum della sentenza CILFIT. Come è noto, nella sentenza, la CGUE ha definito le condizioni in cui non “scatta” l’obbligo di rinvio da parte del ...
Daniele, L
core   +1 more source

L'obbligo (flessibile) di rinvio pregiudiziale e i possibili fattori di un suo irrigidimento. Riflessioni in margine alla sentenza Association France Nature Environnement

European Papers, 2017
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2017 2(1), 383-391 | European Forum Insight of 29 March 2017 | (Table of Contents) I. La questione al vaglio della Corte di giustizia. - II.
Federico Pani
doaj   +1 more source

Multilingual Law and Judicial Interpretation in the EU

Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 2009
The purpose of this article is to assess how multilingualism affects judicial interpretation of EU law. In the EU, the European Court of Justice is in the position of having the final say on what EU norms mean.
Tamara Ćapeta
doaj   +1 more source

CILFIT ‘Motionless Titan’ Has Moved, albeit Softly and with Circumspection: Consorzio Italian Management II [PDF]

, 2022
The unwritten exceptions to the duty to refer, and most notably the so-called ‘acte clair doctrine’ forged in the well-known CILFIT case, have been the subject of much doctrinal attention and severe criticisms. Confronted with a preliminary ruling on the
Lorenzo Cecchetti
core  

A Teleological Interpretation of the Definition of DeepFakes in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act—A Purpose‐Based Approach to Potential Problems With the Word “Existing”

Policy &Internet, Volume 17, Issue 1, March 2025.
ABSTRACT The EU Artificial Intelligence Act is the world's first attempt to holistically regulate artificial intelligence. It presents an extensive, multi‐faceted definition of deepfakes, and introduces specific safeguards against their misuses. These guardrails have the potential to become a global role model.
Mateusz Łabuz
wiley   +1 more source