Results 51 to 60 of about 257 (98)

Sentenza CGUE in causa CILFIT

open access: yes, 2014
Casolari, Federico
core  

Keine Abkehr von CILFIT – Anmerkung zum Urteil des EuGH v. 6.10.2021, Rs. C-561/19 (Consorzio Italian Management)

Europarecht, 2022
Der EuGH hatte sich in der Rs. Consorzio Italian Management erneut mit der in Art. 267 Abs. 3 AEUV normierten Vorlagepflicht letztinstanzlicher mitgliedstaatlicher Gerichte und der CILFIT-Formel als diesbezüglicher Ausnahme zu befassen. Im vorliegenden Urteil hat der EuGH die CILFIT-Formel bestätigt, konkretisiert und dabei realistische Anforderungen ...
Rainer Palmstorfer, Julia Kreuzhuber
exaly   +3 more sources

Cilfit Still Fits

open access: yesEuropean Constitutional Law Review, 2022
What is a good case? Although the question may sound bizarre to the ear of most academics, who are primarily interested in what a good (or a bad) judgment is, judges are probably more familiar with it.
F. Millet
semanticscholar   +5 more sources

Commission v. France (Case C-416/17): How a Tax Dispute Gave the ECJ the Opportunity to Add a New Piece to Its Cilfit (Case 283/81) Puzzle

European Taxation, 2019
In the context of a longstanding dispute over the tax treatment of dividends in France (the “précompte mobilier” dispute), the ECJ ruled, for the first time, that a Member State had failed to fulfil its obligations under EU law because its Supreme Court did not make a reference for a preliminary ruling to the ECJ.
F. Sicard
exaly   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy