Results 11 to 20 of about 5,322 (177)
Partial Compatibilism: Free Will in the Light of Moral Experience [PDF]
Partial compatibilism says that there are basically two kinds of freedom of the will: some free volitions cannot be determined, while others can. My methodological choice is to examine what as- sumptions will appear necessary if we want to take seriously—
David Peroutka
doaj +1 more source
Responsibility problems for criminal justice [PDF]
Sofia Matilda Ingeborg Jeppsson
doaj +2 more sources
On the Possibility оf a Dual-Natured Self
In this paper I examine compatibilism and incompatibilism about whether the self can be both a subject and an object in the same awareness at the same time.
Anand Jayprakash Vaidya
doaj +1 more source
Conditional analysis of free will and consequence argument [PDF]
The conditional analysis of the meaning of the phrase “free will” is a classical compatibilist strategy, first introduced by David Hume and still widely used by compatibilists. The consequence argument is an influential argument against compatibilism.
M. A. Sekatskaya
doaj +1 more source
This article aims to discuss Locke’s compatibilism, that is, the lokean thesis that freedom is compatible with the natural necessity. To this end, it is analized the chapter Of The Power (XXI, book II of the An Essay concerning Human Understanding), in ...
Marília Côrtes de Ferraz
doaj +1 more source
The Role of Various Readings of Free Will in the Use of Punishment Theories (Focused on Mulla Sadra's View) [PDF]
Free will is one of the philosophical topics that have important and significant function in the humanities. Various readings of free will have been provided; each of these readings has functions in the humanities that are completely different from other
Mohammad Hosseinzadeh
doaj +1 more source
Shepherd on Causal Necessity and Human Agency
Shepherd defends an account of the universe founded on two causal principles: that effects necessarily have causes, and that like causes have like effects.
Louise Daoust
doaj +4 more sources
DRETSKE ON METAPHYSICS AND FREEDOM; pp. 173–178 [PDF]
In this paper, Fred Dretskeâs component theory of action is evaluated. Dretske claims that in his theory reasons are parts or components of action. Thus, reasons do not cause actions because a part cannot cause the whole whose part it is.
Olli Koistinen
doaj +1 more source

