Results 141 to 150 of about 336 (165)
Condorcet's principle implies the no show paradox
In elections with variable (and potentially large) electorates, Brams and Fishburn's No Show Paradox arises when a voter is better off not voting than casting a sincere ballot.. Scoring methods do not generate the paradox.
Hervé Moulin
exaly +2 more sources
The Condorcet paradox: an experimental approach to a voting process [PDF]
This paper analyses the effects played by rules within a coordination game. The starting point is constituted by the wide field of Public Choice theories. More precisely the focus of the research is on the stability of the voting process. The experiment is build on a game played through computers and the experimental subjects must perform some choices ...
Luigi Mittone
openaire +1 more source
Unlikelihood of Condorcet's paradox in a large society [PDF]
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Resolving the Condorcet Paradox
American Journal of Sociology, 1971For approximately 200 years scholars and scientists have concerned themselves with the normative aspects of the question of social choice-how preferences should be amalgamated to produce a satisfactory collective decision. They have considered an anomalous, intractable conflict situation discovered by Condorcet.
openaire +1 more source
Condorcet's paradox and anonymous preference profiles
Public Choice, 1976Condorcet's paradox [6] of simple majority voting occurs in a voting situation with n voters and m candidates or alternatives if for every alternative there is a second alternative which more voters prefer to the first alternative than conversely. The paradox can arise only if the strict simple majority relation on the alternatives is cyclic, provided ...
William V. Gehrlein, Peter C. Fishburn
openaire +1 more source
Condorcet’s Paradox and Group Coherence
2010The possibility that various election paradoxes might exist has been seen to be a potentially significant threat to the stability of election processes, and we have developed a number of different mathematical models that can be used to assess the likelihood that these paradoxes might actually be observed.
William V. Gehrlein, Dominique Lepelley
openaire +1 more source
Condorcet voting methods avoid the paradoxes of voting theory
2012 50th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), 2012Democratically choosing a single preference from more than two candidate options is not a straightforward matter. In fact, voting theory has established a number of paradoxes which assert seemingly innocuous attributes to be incompatible. One of the most desirable attributes — independence of irrelevant alternatives — is proven by Arrow to be ...
Tiance Wang +3 more
openaire +1 more source
Exploring the No-Show Paradox for Condorcet Extensions
2020An important and surprising phenomenon in voting theory is the No-Show Paradox (NSP), which occurs if a voter is better off by abstaining from an election. While it is known that certain voting rules suffer from this paradox in principle, the extent to which it is of practical concern is not well understood.
Felix Brandt +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Condorcet, deux autres paradoxes ?
Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 1996La combinaison de systèmes de préférences individuelles peut aboutir globalement à choisir une solution qui ne satisfasse personne. C'est à propos des fonctions de préférences collectives existant à un moment donné que Condorcet démontre son célèbre paradoxe. Il semble que son raisonnement puisse être transposé à la formation dans le temps des systèmes
openaire +2 more sources
The Strong No Show Paradoxes are a common flaw in Condorcet voting correspondences [PDF]
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +1 more source

