Results 121 to 130 of about 336 (165)

Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making. [PDF]

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2016
Tsetsos K, Moran R, Moreland J, Chater N, Usher M, Summerfield C.   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Quorum responses and consensus decision making. [PDF]

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2009
Sumpter DJ, Pratt SC.
europepmc   +1 more source

Choosing from a Weighted Tournament.

Truchon, Michel, De Donder, Philippe, Le Breton, Michel   +2 more
core  

Combinatorial Voting [PDF]

David S. Ahn, Santiago Oliveros
core  

Elections Can be Manipulated Often [PDF]

Gil Kalai, Ehud Friedgut, Noam Nisan
core  

Condorcet choice and the Ostrogorski paradox

Social Choice and Welfare, 2008
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Gilbert Laffond, Jean Lainé
openaire   +3 more sources

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Condorcet’s Paradox and Ultrafilters

American Mathematical Monthly, 2020
We prove a version of Arrow’s impossibility theorem that at its heart is essentially Condorcet’s voting paradox.
exaly   +2 more sources

On the empirical relevance of Condorcet’s paradox

Public Choice, 2013
Condorcet’s paradox occurs when there is no alternative that beats every other alternative by majority. The paradox may pose real problems to democratic decision making such as decision deadlocks and democratic paralysis. However, its relevance has been discussed again and again since the celebrated works of Arrow (Social choice and individual values ...
Adrian Van Deemen
exaly   +2 more sources

Remarks on the Condorcet's paradox

AIP Conference Proceedings, 2007
The voting paradox of Condorcet is briefly revisited. Its relevance in voting systems, real or virtual, is discussed. Sparse remarks on the use of agent based models and on social physics are added.
Andrea Giansanti, Sumiyoshi Abe, Hans Herrmann, Piero Quarati, Andrea Rapisarda, Constantino Tsallis   +5 more
openaire   +2 more sources