Results 11 to 20 of about 336 (165)
Preference fusion and Condorcet's paradox under uncertainty [PDF]
2017 20th International Conference on Information Fusion (Fusion), 2017 Facing an unknown situation, a person may not be able to firmly elicit his/her preferences over different alternatives, so he/she tends to express uncertain preferences. Given a community of different persons expressing their preferences over certain alternatives under uncertainty, to get a collective representative opinion of the whole community, a ...
Zhang, Yiru +2 more
openaire +4 more sources
Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes [PDF]
Public Choice, 2016 The goal of this paper is to propose a comparison of four multi-winner voting rules, k-Plurality, k-Negative Plurality, k-Borda, and Bloc. These four election methods are extensions of usual scoring rules designed for electing a single winner and are compared on the basis of two criteria.
Diss, Mostapha, Doghmi, Ahmed
core +6 more sources
Gender, Work &Organization, Volume 30, Issue 4, Page 1296-1316, July 2023., 2023 Abstract The sudden and unanticipated shocks to employment and the almost total retreat into the domestic sphere caused by the COVID‐19 lockdowns provide a unique opportunity to explore the resilience of the three classical theoretical paradigms of the gendered division of labor within couples, that is, the time availability theory, the relative ...
Myriam Chatot +3 more
wiley +1 more source
The Condorcet paradox revisited [PDF]
, 2013 We analyze the Condorcet paradox within a strategic bargaining model with majority voting, exogenous recognition probabilities, and no discounting.
Herings, P.J.J., Houba, H
core +1 more source
Condorcet's Principle and the Preference Reversal Paradox [PDF]
Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, 2017 In Proceedings TARK 2017, arXiv:1707.08250.
openaire +3 more sources
The effect of categories on the condorcet voting paradox
, 2020 The condorcet voter paradox is a paradox of rankings; it arises when the collective vote of a population arrives at an intransitive preference rankings, so that it prefers A to B, B to C, but C to A; as a result, each time the population is asked to vote
Douglas Guilbeault
core +1 more source
Condorcet’s principle and the strong no-show paradoxes [PDF]
Theory and Decision, 2013 Abstract We consider two no-show paradoxes, in which a voter obtains a preferable outcome by abstaining from a vote. One arises when the casting of a ballot that ranks a candidate in first place causes that candidate to lose the election, superseded by a lower-ranked candidate.
openaire +4 more sources
PhysicsIn this study, we propose how to use objective arguments grounded in statistical mechanics concepts in order to obtain a single number, obtained after aggregation, which would allow for the ranking of “agents”, “opinions”, etc., all defined in a very ...
Marcel Ausloos +2 more
doaj +1 more source
The right to decide: A decision‐based perspective on corporate stakeholder governance
Strategic Management Journal, Volume 46, Issue 12, Page 3023-3047, December 2025.Abstract Research Summary Complications arise when stakeholders with heterogeneous and potentially misaligned preferences are considered in corporate decisions. This paper examines how high‐level decision‐making corporate forums, such as boards, can address such heterogeneous claims. We identify three corporate stakeholder governance types depending on
Vitor de Barros Santos Freire +2 more
wiley +1 more source
The Trembling Chairman Paradox [PDF]
, 2022 The Chairman Paradox (Farquharson, 1969) is a classical observation in voting games showing that a Chairman endowed with tie-breaking power might end up with her worst outcome.
Alos-Ferrer, Carlos; https://orcid.org/ +1 more
core +1 more source