Results 91 to 100 of about 13,204 (193)
ABSTRACT When what justifies you in believing a proposition is some evidence you have, you are doxastically justified only if you believe that proposition on the basis of that evidence. According to causal theories of basing, this basing relation must be a causal relation.
Juan Comesaña, Carolina Sartorio
wiley +1 more source
Ghosting in the Job Market: The Principle of Communicative Reciprocity and the Duty of Transparency
Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
Niels de Haan
wiley +1 more source
ABSTRACT Joint inquiry requires agents to exchange public content about some target domain, which in turn requires them to track which content a linguistic form contributes to a conversation. But, often, the inquiry delivers a necessary truth. For example, if we are inquiring whether a particular bird, Tweety, is a woodpecker, and discover that it is ...
Una Stojnić, Matthew Stone
wiley +1 more source
Optimizing the computation of overriding
We introduce optimization techniques for reasoning in DLN---a recently introduced family of nonmonotonic description logics whose characterizing features appear well-suited to model the applicative examples naturally arising in biomedical domains and ...
BC Grau +17 more
core +1 more source
Toward a “strong” normativity of fear in Hans Jonas and Aristotle
Abstract What does it mean to say that one “ought” to undergo an emotion? In The Imperative of Responsibility, Hans Jonas provocatively asserts that twentieth‐century citizens “ought” to fear for the well‐being of future generations. I argue that Jonas's demand is not straightforwardly reducible to claims about the fittingness, expedience, or aretaic ...
Magnus Ferguson
wiley +1 more source
The age of artificial intelligence emphasises the possibility of justification and the dialectical aspects of legal reasoning. The need for validity in legal reasoning mainly stems from the existence of exceptions to rules and conflicts between rules ...
Ze Li +7 more
doaj +1 more source
Representational change is integral to reasoning. [PDF]
Bundy A, Li X.
europepmc +1 more source
Abstract It is well‐recognized in the sciences that a multitude of nonequivalent models are used by researchers to fulfill a range of goals, even for the same target system, a result known broadly as model pluralism. The possibility of the same form of pluralism occurring in logic, however, has not been adequately considered.
Ben Martin
wiley +1 more source
Rational Force of Analogy/Qiyās in Law
Analogy is an inherently fragile form of argument, as it derives the conclusion from similarity, while overlooking dissimilarities. Yet law fundamentally depends upon analogical reasoning to ensure consistency and predictability in its rulings.
Muhammed Komath
doaj +1 more source
Argument-based inductive logics, with coverage of compromised perception. [PDF]
Bringsjord S +6 more
europepmc +1 more source

