Results 71 to 80 of about 11,402 (263)
Tolerating Inconsistencies: A Study of Logic of Moral Conflicts
Moral conflicts are the situations which emerge as a response to deal with conflicting obligations or duties. An interesting case arises when an agent thinks that two obligations A and B are equally important, but yet fails to choose one obligation over ...
Meha Mishra, A.V. Ravishankar Sarma
doaj +1 more source
Abstract It is often said that dignity is the ground of human rights. But what grounds dignity? According to proponents of the metaphysical view, dignity is grounded in our rational capacities, our sense of justice, or a disjunctive list of valuable capacities.
Jordan David Thomas Walters
wiley +1 more source
Investigating the Semantic Development of Modal Markers: The Role of Context
The article tackles the problem of studying diachronic semantic changes of modal markers in Latin. It proposes to do so by using context as a proxy for tracing the development of otherwise unchanging forms.
Tomaž Potočnik, Matej Hriberšek
doaj +1 more source
Dynamic Deontic Logic for Permitted Announcements
peer reviewedIn this paper, we introduce and study a dynamic deontic logic for permitted announcements. In our logic framework, it is permitted to announce something if announcing it would not lead to forbidden knowledge.
LI, Xu, GABBAY, Dov M., MARKOVICH, Réka
core
Deontic Justice and Organizational Neuroscience
According to deontic justice theory, individuals often feel principled moral obligations to uphold norms of justice. That is, standards of justice can be valued for their own sake, even apart from serving self-interested goals.
Russell S. Cropanzano +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
A shift from evaluation (‘it is good, fitting’, etc.) to deontic modality is well known from the literature on grammaticalization. This article looks at it from the viewpoint of complementation.
Axel Holvoet
doaj +3 more sources
Contrary-to-Duty Scenarios, Deontic Dilemmas, and Transmission Principles*
Actualists hold that contrary-to-duty scenarios give rise to deontic dilemmas and provide counterexamples to the transmission principle, according to which we ought to take the necessary means to actions we ought to perform. In an earlier article, I have
Benjamin Kiesewetter
semanticscholar +1 more source
Defeasibility applied to Forrester’s paradox
Deontic logic is a logic often used to formalise scenarios in the legal domain. Within the legal domain there are many exceptions and conflicting obligations. This motivates the enrichment of deontic logic with not only the notion of defeasibility, which
Julian Chingoma, Thomas Meyer
doaj +1 more source
How generics obscure the logic of conditionals
This paper discusses counter‐examples to modus ponens and modus tollens involving modals and quantificational adverbs, and presents new counter‐examples with generic conditionals. We argue that the counter‐examples are spurious, and are explained by the domain‐restricting effects of if‐clauses.
Daniel Lassiter +3 more
wiley +1 more source
åqvist's Dyadic Deontic Logic E in HOL
We devise a shallow semantical embedding of Åqvist's dyadic deontic logic E in classical higher-order logic. This embedding is encoded in Isabelle/HOL, which turns this system into a proof assistant for deontic logic reasoning.
Christoph Benzmüller +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source

