Results 131 to 140 of about 10,626,776 (155)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
New bounds on the outer-independent total double Roman domination number
Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications, 2023A double Roman dominating function (DRDF) on a graph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] satisfying (i) if [Formula: see text] then there must be at least two neighbors assigned two under [Formula: see text] or one neighbor [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]; and (ii) if [Formula: see text] then [Formula: see text] must be ...
Seyed Mahmoud Sheikholeslami +1 more
openaire +2 more sources
An upper bound on the double Roman domination number
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2018From the summary: ``A double Roman dominating function (DRDF) on a graph \(G=(V, E)\) is a function \(f: V\to \{0,1, 2, 3\}\) having the property that if \(f(v)=0\), then vertex \(v\) must have at least two neighbors assigned \(2\) under \(f\) or one neighbor \(w\) with \(f(w)=3\), and if \(f(v)=1\), then vertex \(v\) must have at least one neighbor ...
Jafar Amjadi +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
On the double Roman domination number in trees
Australas. J Comb., 2020Summary: For a graph \(G\), let \(\gamma_{dR}(G)\) and \(\gamma_R(G)\) denote the double Roman domination number and the Roman domination number, respectively. In this paper, we show that for every tree \(T\) of order \(n\geq 3\), with \(\ell(T)\) leaves and \(s(T)\) support vertices, \begin{align*} \gamma_R(T)+\lceil & \frac{\ell(T)-s(T)}{\Delta(T ...
Sakineh Nazari-Moghaddam +1 more
openaire +2 more sources
Extremal Digraphs for an Upper Bound on the Double Roman Domination Number
Bulletin of the Malaysian Mathematical Sciences Society, 2019zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Ouldrabah, Lyes +3 more
openaire +1 more source
A note on the double Roman domination number of graphs
Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 2019zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
openaire +2 more sources
Disprove of a conjecture on the double Roman domination number
Aequationes mathematicaeThe paper addresses a conjecture regarding the double Roman domination number \(\gamma_{dR}(G)\) in graph theory, a topic introduced by \textit{R. A. Beeler} et al. [Discrete Appl. Math. 211, 23--29 (2016; Zbl 1348.05146)]. The double Roman dominating function (DRDF) \(f: V \to \{0, 1, 2, 3\}\) on a graph \(G = (V, E)\) requires specific conditions on ...
Z. Shao +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Discrete Applied Mathematics, 2019
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Rana Khoeilar +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Rana Khoeilar +3 more
openaire +3 more sources
Bounds on the quasi-total double Roman domination number in graphs
Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and ApplicationsA quasi-total double Roman dominating function (QTDRD-function) on a graph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] having the property that (i) if [Formula: see text], then vertex [Formula: see text] must have at least two neighbors assigned 2 under [Formula: see text] or one neighbor [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]; (ii) if [
J. Amjadi +4 more
openaire +1 more source
Independent double roman domination number of a tree in terms of its 2-independence number
Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and ApplicationsLet [Formula: see text] be a simple graph. An independent double Roman dominating function (IDRDF) on a graph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] having the property that first if [Formula: see text], then vertex [Formula: see text] has at least two neighbors assigned [Formula: see text] under [Formula: see text] or one neighbor ...
Halimeh Koulivand +3 more
openaire +1 more source
On computing total double Roman domination number of trees in linear time
2020Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph. A doubleRoman dominating function (DRDF) on $G$ is a function$f:Vto{0,1,2,3}$ such that for every vertex $vin V$if $f(v)=0$, then either there is a vertex $u$ adjacent to $v$ with $f(u)=3$ orthere are vertices $x$ and $y$ adjacent to $v$ with $f(x)=f(y)=2$ and if $f(v)=1$, then there is a vertex $u$ adjacent to $v$ with$f(u ...
openaire +1 more source

