Results 241 to 250 of about 150,693 (295)
, 2017 Dual Process Theory 2.0 provides a comprehensive overview of the new directions in which dual process research is heading. Human thinking is often characterized as an interplay between intuition and deliberation and this two-headed, dual process view of human thinking has been very influential in the cognitive sciences and popular media.
de Neys, Wim
core +5 more sources
A Cognitive Architecture Based on Dual Process Theory
, 2013 This paper proposes a cognitive architecture based on Kahneman's dual process theory [1]. The long-term memory is modeled as a transparent neural network that develops autonomously by interacting with the environment. The working memory is modeled as a buffer containing nodes of the long-term memory.
Claes Strannegård +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
A rational reinterpretation of dual-process theories
Cognition, 2021Highly influential "dual-process" accounts of human cognition postulate the coexistence of a slow accurate system with a fast error-prone system. But why would there be just two systems rather than, say, one or 93? Here, we argue that a dual-process architecture might reflect a rational tradeoff between the cognitive flexibility afforded by multiple ...
Milli, S., Lieder, F., Griffiths, T.
openaire +3 more sources
Predicting and Reflecting: A Dual Framework for Dual Process Theory
, 2023 Dual Process Theory has increasingly gained fame as a framework for explaining evidence in reasoning and decision making tasks. This theory proposes there must be a sharp distinction in thinking to explain two clusters of correlational features. One cluster describes a fast and intuitive process (Type 1), while the other describes a slow andreflective ...
Samuel C Bellini-Leite
openaire +2 more sources
From theory to practice: a roadmap for applying dual-process theory in design cognition research [PDF]
Journal of Engineering DesignDual-process theory categorises cognition into two types of processing: Type 1 which is intuitive, autonomous processing, and Type 2 which is reflective processing that burdens limited executive cognitive resources (i.e. working memory).
Meagan Flus +2 more
exaly +1 more source
Toward dual-process theory 3.0
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2023Abstract This commentary is sympathetic to De Neys's revision of dual-process theory but argues for a modification to his position on exclusivity and proposes a bold further revision, envisaging a dual-process theory 3.0, in which system 1 not only initiates system 2 thinking but generates and sustains it as well.
openaire +2 more sources
Thinking & Reasoning, 2020
Dual process theory (DPT) states that cognitive performance is the result of two types of processing, usually termed Type 1 and Type 2. Thompson and Newman (this volume, p.
openaire +1 more source
Dual process theory (DPT) states that cognitive performance is the result of two types of processing, usually termed Type 1 and Type 2. Thompson and Newman (this volume, p.
openaire +1 more source
Dual‐Process and Dual‐System Theories of Reasoning
Philosophy Compass, 2010Abstract Dual‐process theories hold that there are two distinct processing modes available for many cognitive tasks: one (type 1) that is fast, automatic and non‐conscious, and another (type 2) that is slow, controlled and conscious.
openaire +1 more source
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2013Dual-process and dual-system theories in both cognitive and social psychology have been subjected to a number of recently published criticisms. However, they have been attacked as a category, incorrectly assuming there is a generic version that applies to all. We identify and respond to 5 main lines of argument made by such critics.
Jonathan St B T, Evans +1 more
openaire +2 more sources
Theory and Metatheory in the Study of Dual Processing
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2013In this article, we respond to the four comments on our target article. Some of the commentators suggest that we have formulated our proposals in a way that renders our account of dual-process theory untestable and less interesting than the broad theory that has been critiqued in recent literature.
Jonathan St B T, Evans +1 more
openaire +2 more sources