Results 11 to 20 of about 3,295 (146)
Enthymemes: From Reconstruction to Understanding [PDF]
Traditionally, an enthymeme is an incomplete argument, made so by the absence of one or more of its constituent statements. An enthymeme resolution strategy is a set of procedures for finding those missing elements, thus reconstructing the enthymemes and restoring its meaning.
Paglieri, F., Woods, J.
openaire +6 more sources
Abstract I suggest that the theories of remembering one finds in the philosophy of memory literature are best characterised as theories principally operating at three different levels of inquiry. Simulationist views are theories of the psychofunctional process type remembering. Causalist views are theories of referential remembering.
James Openshaw
wiley +1 more source
Paradox as resistance in male dominated fields and the value of (sur)facing enthymematic narratives
Abstract Women working in masculine organizational contexts face a challenge of balancing (1) access to power by co‐opting masculine discourse in ways that risk reinforcing it, with (2) challenging and resisting practices that privilege masculinity.
Jennifer J. Mease, Bronwyn Neal
wiley +1 more source
A Bayesian interpretation of cross‐linguistic ambiguity tests
Cross‐linguistic comparisons serve as empirical tests generating evidence for and against lexical ambiguity in words like “good”, “know”, “the”, “can”, and “may”. Critics question such comparisons' validity. This article examines how cross‐linguistic comparisons are treated as tests and shows that they have two predominant forms: one modeled on modus ...
Christopher Langston
wiley +1 more source
L’inférence dans les romans judiciaires d’Émile Gaboriau
Résumé L’injection de l’heuristique dans le romanesque est loin d’être un recours littéraire nouveau. Un certain nombre de romanciers (tels Voltaire, Balzac, Bernanos, Robbe‐Grillet ou Butor) ne se sont pas privés d’y toucher. Ceci dit, ce sont notamment les écrivains attitrés du genre policier qui s’y sont spécialisés.
Daniela Ventura
wiley +1 more source
One philosopher's modus ponens is another's modus tollens: Pantomemes and nisowir
That one person's modus ponens is another's modus tollens is the bane of philosophy because it strips many philosophical arguments of their persuasive force. The problem is that philosophical arguments become mere pantomemes: arguments that are reasonable to resist simply by denying the conclusion.
Jon Williamson
wiley +1 more source
Generics and the metaphysics of kinds
Abstract Recent years have seen renewed interest in the semantics of generics. And a relatively mainstream view in this work is that the semantics of generics must appeal to kinds. But what are kinds? Can we learn anything about their nature by looking at how semantic theories of generics appeal to them?
David Liebesman +1 more
wiley +1 more source
The sources of Mill's views of ratiocination and induction [PDF]
Steffen Ducheyne and John P. McCaskey (2014). “The Sources of Mill’s Views of Ratiocination and Induction,” in: Antis Loizides (ed.), John Stuart Mill’s ‘A System of Logic’: A Critical Guide (London, Routledge), pp.
Ducheyne, Steffen, McCaskey, John P
core +2 more sources
The Darwinian Rhetoric of Science in Petr Kropotkin's Mutual Aid. A Factor of Evolution (1902)
Abstract The paper explores the significance of rhetorical argumentation in Petr Kropotkin's treatise Mutual Aid. A Factor of Evolution (1902). It argues that Kropotkin's work is steeped in the tradition of a rhetoric of science that is profoundly Darwinian and in which various forms of analogic reasoning play a central role.
Riccardo Nicolosi
wiley +1 more source
Methodology Matters; Even More
This editorial essay reflects on the importance of a section like Methodology Matters and its first two years. It also introduces the six articles in this issue of the European Management Review (EMR) that follow this essay and have progressed successfully through the review process for publication and it suggests ways in which the debates that each of
Bill Lee
wiley +1 more source

