Results 261 to 270 of about 48,996 (281)

Knowing Disability, Differently [PDF]

Tremain, Shelley
core  

To Desire What Is Nothing: Simone Weil, Asceticism and Psychoanalysis

Critical Quarterly, EarlyView.
Georgie Newson
wiley   +1 more source

On epistemic freedom and epistemic injustice

Inquiry
openaire   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

The Epistemic Injustice of Racial Injustice

Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, 2021
The treatment of essential health care providers belonging to racial and ethnic minority groups is a bioethical issue. Minority providers hold valuable knowledge of the racism they experience. However, they are continuously doubted, discredited, and disempowered as epistemic interlocutors.
openaire   +2 more sources

Epistemic injustice and the psychiatrist

Psychological Medicine, 2023
AbstractBackgroundPsychiatrists depend on their patients for clinical information and are obligated to regard them as trustworthy, except in special circumstances. Nevertheless, some critics of psychiatry have argued that psychiatrists frequently perpetrate epistemic injustice against patients.
Brent M. Kious, Benjamin R. Lewis, Scott Y. H. Kim   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Trust

Social Epistemology, 2012
Miranda Fricker has introduced the insightful notion of epistemic injustice in the philosophical debate, thus bridging concerns of social epistemology with questions that arise in the area of social and cultural studies. I concentrate my analysis of her treatment of testimonial injustice. According to Fricker, the central cases of testimonial injustice
openaire   +1 more source

Anticipatory Epistemic Injustice

Social Epistemology, 2021
Epistemic injustices are wrongs that agents can suffer in their capacity as knowers. In this article, I offer a conceptualisation of a phenomenon I call anticipatory epistemic injustice, which I cl...
openaire   +2 more sources

Epistemic Injustice

Philosophy Compass, 2016
Abstract There's been a great deal of interest in epistemology regarding what it takes for a hearer to come to know on the basis of a speaker's say‐so. That is, there's been much work on the epistemology of testimony. However, what about when hearers don't believe speakers when they should?
openaire   +1 more source

Medicalization and epistemic injustice

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2014
Many critics of medicalization (the process by which phenomena become candidates for medical definition, explanation and treatment) express concern that the process privileges individualised, biologically grounded interpretations of medicalized phenomena, inhibiting understanding and communication of aspects of those phenomena that are less relevant to
openaire   +2 more sources