Results 1 to 10 of about 95,023 (252)
Testimonial Injustice and Mutual Recognition [PDF]
Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 2021 Much of the recent work on the nature of testimonial injustice holds that a hearer who fails to accord sufficient credibility to a speaker’s testimony, owing to identity prejudice, can thereby wrong that speaker.
Lindsay Crawford
doaj +4 more sources
Testimonial Injustice in Evidential Reasoning [PDF]
Quaestio FactiThis article critiques Federico Picinali’s theoretical framework for explaining how testimonial injustice impacts evidential reasoning. It argues that Picinali’s framework, though intended to be general, falls short in capturing various forms of ...
Rachel Herdy
doaj +5 more sources
Weaponized testimonial injustice
Las Torres de Lucca, 2021 Theoretical tools aimed at making explicit the injustices suffered by certain socially disadvantaged groups might end up serving purposes which were not foreseen when the tools were first introduced. Nothing is inherently wrong with a shift in the scope
Manuel Almagro +2 more
doaj +4 more sources
Trust, distrust, and testimonial injustice [PDF]
Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2022 This essay investigates an underappreciated way in which trust and testimonial injustice are closely connected. Credibility deficit and credibility excess cases both (in their own distinctive ways) contribute to a speaker’s being harmed in her capacity a knower.
Carter, J Adam, Meehan, Daniella
openaire +3 more sources
Testimonial Injustice and Prediction Markets [PDF]
Social Epistemology, 2022 This essay argues that prediction markets, as one approach for aggregating dispersed private information, may not only be praised for their epistemic accuracy. They also feature characteristics that are morally desirable from the point of view of epistemic justice.
Carl David Mildenberger
exaly +2 more sources
Accurate Stereotypes and Testimonial Injustice
European Journal of Analytic PhilosophyIn How Stereotypes Deceive Us, Katherine Puddifoot provides a convincing non-normative account of what stereotypes are, and of the conditions under which we appropriately rely on them in achieving our epistemic and ethical goals.
Leonie Smith
doaj +2 more sources
From speaker to hearer. Another type of testimonial injustice
Estudios de Filosofía, 2022 Miranda Fricker always focuses on the hearer in her account of testimonial injustice. It is the hearer who, in virtue of a prejudice, commits testimonial injustice against the speaker by giving her less credibility than she deserves.
Ignacio Ávila
doaj +1 more source
Redescriptions, 2022 This article focuses on the epistemic transition to testimonial justice. It argues that the recognition of testimonial injustice in the context of reproductive rights may play a central role in this transition.
Romina Rekers
doaj +1 more source
Mansplaining as Epistemic Injustice
Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 2021 “Mansplaining” is by now part of the common cultural vernacular. Yet, academic analyses of it—specifically, philosophical ones—are missing. This paper sets out to address just that problem. Analyzed through a lens of epistemic injustice, the focus of the
Nicole Dular
doaj +1 more source
Testimonial Injustice and the Disquieting Conclusion: A Critique of the Critical Consciousness Requirement for Moral Culpability [PDF]
Organon F, 2023 In this paper, I will provide a critique of what I wish to call the “critical consciousness requirement” for moral culpability in Miranda Fricker’s theory of testimonial injustice.
Pamela Ann Boongaling
doaj +1 more source