Testimonial Injustice from Countervailing Prejudices [PDF]
Social Epistemology, 2023 In this paper I argue that Fricker’s influential account of testimonial injustice (hereafter ‘TI’) should be expanded to include cases of TI from mutually neutralising countervailing prejudices.
Federico Luzzi
openalex +2 more sources
Testimonial Injustice and Its Harms in Hemodialysis Patients in Japan: A Qualitative Study. [PDF]
CureusHokibara M, Tsuruwaka M.
europepmc +3 more sources
Testimonial Injustice: Linguistic Bias in the Medical Records of Black Patients and Women. [PDF]
J Gen Intern Med, 2021 Beach MC +7 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Making life more interesting: Trust, trustworthiness, and testimonial injustice
Philosophical PsychologyA theme running through Katherine Hawley’s recent works on trust and trustworthiness is that thinking about the relations between these and Miranda Fricker’s notion of testimonial injustice offers a perspective from which we can see several limitations ...
Aidan Mcglynn
exaly +1 more source
From speaker to hearer. Another type of testimonial injustice
Estudios de Filosofía, 2022 Miranda Fricker always focuses on the hearer in her account of testimonial injustice. It is the hearer who, in virtue of a prejudice, commits testimonial injustice against the speaker by giving her less credibility than she deserves.
Ignacio Ávila
doaj +1 more source
“He told me my pain was in my head”: Testimonial injustice in patient-physician relationships
International Journal of Whole Person CareWomen living with chronic pain are more likely than men to experience pain dismissal, receive nonspecific diagnostics, receive fewer follow-ups, have their condition undertreated, and be told that it results from a psychological condition.
Marie Vigouroux +2 more
openalex +2 more sources
Testimonial Injustice and the Nature of Epistemic Injustice [PDF]
This chapter examines Miranda Fricker’s concept of testimonial injustice (TI), in which speakers face unjust credibility deficits due to identity-based prejudice. While her framework has been foundational, critics highlight its limitations.
McWilliams, Emily
exaly +2 more sources
Mansplaining as Epistemic Injustice
Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 2021 “Mansplaining” is by now part of the common cultural vernacular. Yet, academic analyses of it—specifically, philosophical ones—are missing. This paper sets out to address just that problem. Analyzed through a lens of epistemic injustice, the focus of the
Nicole Dular
doaj +1 more source
Common Ground, Conversational Roles and Epistemic Injustice [PDF]
Organon F, 2021 People partaking in a conversation can add to the common ground of said conversation by performing different speech acts. That is, they can influence which propositions are presumed to be shared among them.
Felix Bräuer
doaj +1 more source
True Crime Television as ‘Popular Legality’: Affect, Testimonial Injustice, and the Criminal (In)Justice System in Ava DuVernay’s When They See Us [PDF]
Law, Culture and the Humanities, 2023 This article examines the Netflix true crime series When They See Us (2019) as a form of “popular legality” (Olson 2022). I argue that the show criticizes structural racism in the US criminal justice system and emphasizes this critique on a level of ...
Annika Thiem
openalex +2 more sources