Results 251 to 260 of about 402,354 (276)

Explanationism provides the best explanation of the epistemic significance of peer disagreement

Philosophical Studies, 2019
In this paper, I provide a novel explanationist framework for thinking about peer disagreement that solves many of the puzzles regarding disagreement that have troubled epistemologists over the last two decades. Explanationism is the view that a subject is justified in believing a proposition just in case that proposition is part of the best ...
openaire   +1 more source

Soft Query-Answering Computing in P2P Systems with Epistemically Independent Peers

2008
Knowledge-based systems typically deals with incomplete and uncertain knowledge. Numerous extensions have been made to the logic programming and deductive databases in order to handle this incompleteness/uncertainty. These extensions can broadly be characterized into non-probabilistic and probabilistic formalisms.
Zoran Majkić, Bhanu Prasad
openaire   +1 more source

The Epistemic Shift in Science Communication: Strategic Foresight for the Future of Peer Review

Science Communication
Peer review serves as the primary “gatekeeping” mechanism in science communication, filtering validated knowledge from noise before it reaches the public sphere. This commentary argues that integrating Generative AI into this process acts as a structural disruptor, threatening to erode the “seal of quality” that underpins public trust in science.
Cezary Biele, Jarosław Kowalski
openaire   +1 more source

What Should We Do in the Face of Epistemic Peer Disagreement?

2019
In the previous chapter, I have introduced an E-RULE approach to epistemic responsibility assessment. I have argued that this doxastic responsibility assessment is epistemically significant because it is governed by certain epistemic norms, namely the norms of reliable intellectual conduct.
openaire   +1 more source

Epistemics and Expertise in Peer Tutoring Interactions: Co‐Constructing Knowledge of Spanish

The Modern Language Journal, 2016
Peer tutoring is viewed as a valuable component of additional language learning due to the presence of a more knowledgeable interlocutor. Yet researchers and language program directors alike often ignore the linguistic and cultural differences that peer tutors possess, instead categorizing them homogeneously as ‘experts’ or ‘native speakers.’ In this ...
openaire   +1 more source

Children’s epistemic reasoning about social inclusion of aggressive peers in a culturally diverse school

British Educational Research Journal, 2022
Sue Walker, Laura Scholes, Jo Lunn Brownlee   +2 more
exaly  

Marginalised Youth Activism: Peer-Engaged Research and Epistemic Justice

Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 2021
Stacy J. Kosko, Aimee Dastin, Maddy Merrill, Roma Sheth   +3 more
openaire   +1 more source

A Postsecular Rationale? Religious and Secular as Epistemic Peers

2013
In Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State, Robert Audi considera il problema del disaccordo fra persone ugualmente razionali su questioni politiche in materia di coercizione, analizzando le caratteristiche delle discussioni fra persone epistemicamente pari, e sostenendo un principio normativo di tolleranza. Si può tuttavia mettere
openaire   +2 more sources

The epistemic significance of peer disagreement

2020
openaire   +1 more source

Speciesism, Prejudice, and Epistemic Peer Disagreement

The Journal of Value Inquiry, 2020
openaire   +1 more source