Results 241 to 250 of about 402,354 (276)
The adaptive learning taxonomy for responsible large language model integration in higher education. [PDF]
Discov Artif IntellBaradziej S, Kochanska A.
europepmc +1 more source
Epistemically Different Epistemic Peers
Topoi, 2019 For over a decade now epistemologists have been thinking about the peer disagreement problem of whether a person is reasonable in not lowering her confidence in her belief P when she comes to accept that she has an epistemic peer on P who disbelieves P.
Mariangela Zoe Cocchiaro, Bryan Frances
exaly +3 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Discovering Disagreeing Epistemic Peers and Superiors
International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 2012Abstract Suppose you know that someone is your epistemic peer regarding some topic. You admit that you cannot think of any relevant epistemic advantage you have over her when it comes to that topic; you admit that she is just as likely as you to get P’s truth-value right.
Bryan Frances
exaly +2 more sources
On Merely Modal Epistemic Peers: Challenging the Equal-Weight View
Philosophia (United States), 2012There is a controversy, within social epistemology, over how to handle disagreement among epistemic peers. Call this the problem of peer disagreement. There is a solution, i.e. the equal-weight view, which says that disagreement among epistemic peers is a reason for each peer to lower the credence they place in their respective positions. However, this
exaly +2 more sources
Epistemic-Peer Disagreement and Pyrrhonic Scepticism
Abstract The current philosophical discussion about disagreement among epistemic peers may seem to provide a direct route to Pyrrhonic scepticism, but that appearance is misleading. Real disagreement among epistemic peers is a rarity because no two people are actually epistemic peers except in circumstances where what’s at question is ...exaly +2 more sources
Faultless disagreement, cognitive command, and epistemic peers
Synthese, 2014Relativism and contextualism are the most popular accounts of faultless disagreement, but Crispin Wright once argued for an account I call divergentism. According to divergentism, parties who possess all relevant information and use the same standards of assessment in the same context of utterance can disagree about the same proposition without either ...
openaire +1 more source
Procedural Control of the Bureaucracy, Peer Review, and Epistemic Drift
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2004Regulatory peer review - in which independent scientists comment on the technical underpinnings of proposed regulations - is a recently pursued form of political control of the bureaucracy. This paper situates regulatory peer review in the context of both the history of technical advice to government and the principal-agent perspective often used to ...
David Guston, Stuart Shapiro
openaire +1 more source
Query Processing in Peer-to-Peer Systems: An Epistemic Logic Approach
2005In peer-to-peer (P2P) systems, each peer exports information in terms of its own schema, and interoperation is achieved by means of mappings among the peer schemas. Peers are autonomous systems and mappings are dynamically created and changed. One of the challenges in these systems is processing queries posed to one peer taking into account the ...
openaire +2 more sources