Results 1 to 10 of about 165,938,516 (260)
Deep Disagreement (Part 2): Epistemology of Deep Disagreement. [PDF]
Philos Compass, 2022 Abstract What is the epistemological significance of deep disagreement? Part I explored the nature of deep disagreement, while Part II considers its epistemological significance. It focuses on two core problems: the incommensurability and the rational resolvability problems.
Ranalli C, Lagewaard T.
europepmc +5 more sources
Deep disagreement and hinge epistemology [PDF]
SynthÈse, 2018 AbstractThis paper explores the application of hinge epistemology to deep disagreement. Hinge epistemology holds that there is a class of commitments—hinge commitments—which play a fundamental role in the structure of belief and rational evaluation: they are the most basic general ‘presuppositions’ of our world views which make it possible for us to ...
Chris Ranalli
exaly +4 more sources
Intellectual humility and the epistemology of disagreement [PDF]
SynthÈse, 2018 AbstractIt is widely accepted that one strong motivation for adopting a conciliatory stance with regard to the epistemology of peer disagreement is that the non-conciliatory alternatives are incompatible with the demands of intellectual character, and incompatible with the virtue of intellectual humility in particular.
Duncan Pritchard
exaly +8 more sources
POLITICAL JUSTIFICATIONISM: A CASUISTIC EPISTEMOLOGY OF POLITICAL DISAGREEMENT [PDF]
Trames, 2020 The conciliationist and steadfast approaches have dominated the conversation in the epistemology of disagreement. In this paper, drawing on Jennifer Lackeyâs justificationist approach and the casuistry paradigm in medical ethics, I will develop a more ...
Jay Carlson
doaj +6 more sources
Deliberative democracy and the epistemology of disagreement [PDF]
Belgrade Philosophical Annual, 2014 Our goal in this article is to explore the relevance of the recent debate on epistemology of disagreement for democratic theory and especially for deliberative democracy.
Mladenović Ivan
doaj +2 more sources
Wittgensteinian Hinge Epistemology and Deep Disagreement [PDF]
Topoi, 2018 Deep disagreements concern our most basic and fundamental commitments. Such disagreements seem to be problematic because they appear to manifest epistemic incommensurability in our epistemic systems, and thereby lead to epistemic relativism. This problem is confronted via consideration of a Wittgensteinian hinge epistemology.
Duncan Pritchard
exaly +5 more sources
The epistemology of moral disagreement
Philosophy Compass, 2017 Abstract This article is about the implications of a conciliatory view about the epistemology of peer disagreement for our moral beliefs. Many have endorsed a conciliatory view about the epistemology of peer disagreement according to which if we find ourselves in a disagreement about some matter with another whom we should judge to be
Rach Cosker-Rowland
exaly +4 more sources
Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News [PDF]
Philosophical Review, The, 2007 We all live out our lives in states of epistemic imperfection. Most obviously, this is true because the evidence on which we base our beliefs is limited. Only a little less obviously, we live in states of epistemic imperfection because we do not always respond to the evidence we have in the best way.
exaly +2 more sources
Nietzsche’s positivism: discussion between Modemary Clark and Nadeem Hussain [PDF]
Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность", 2020 The paper explores a fragment of methodological debate about Nietzsche’s relationship to positivism. On the one hand, Nietzsche’s critique of metaphysics is grounded in empirical arguments and appeals to positivist epistemology of his contemporaries ...
G. V. Biserov
doaj +1 more source
Philosophies, 2023 Since the early 20th century, two new disciplines emerged in the tradition of analytic philosophy: meta-ethics and political epistemology. Nevertheless, debates on such questions go back to the ancient Greeks and, in particular, to the debates between ...
Manuel Knoll
doaj +1 more source