The Epistemology of Disagreement [PDF]
, 2013 PART ONE: THE DEBATE BETWEEN CONCILIATORY AND STEADFAST THEORISTS A. FOR STEADFASTNESS B. FOR CONCILIATION PART TWO: DISAGREEMENT IN PHILOSOPHY PART THREE: NEW CONCEPTS AND NEW PROBLEMS IN THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF ...
Weatherson, Brian James
core +4 more sources
Deep Disagreement (Part 1): Theories of Deep Disagreement. [PDF]
Philos Compass, 2022 Some disagreements concern our most fundamental beliefs, principles, values, or worldviews, such as those about the existence of God, society and politics, or the trustworthiness of science. These are ‘deep disagreements’.
Ranalli C, Lagewaard T.
europepmc +2 more sources
The Dialogue Between Believers and Atheists: the Platonic Model in the Laws
Problemos, 2021 This paper examines the question concerning the right model of epistemically rational dialogue. First of all, the main, though not undisputed, principles of rational dialogue are defined according to the contemporary field of the epistemology of ...
Simonas Baliukonis
doaj +1 more source
PRINCIPLES OF DISAGREEMENT, THE PRACTICAL CASE FOR EPISTEMIC SELF-TRUST, AND WHY THE TWO DON’T GET ALONG [PDF]
Trames, 2020 This paper discusses the normative structure of principles that require belief-revision in the face of disagreement, the role of self-trust in our epistemic lives, and the tensions that arise between the two.
Simon Barker
doaj +1 more source
Social epistemic inequalities, redundancy and epistemic reliability in governance [PDF]
Filozofija i Društvo, 2020 In this paper I argue that social epistemic inequalities, exemplified by expert structures and their introduction into various social and political processes, may be a collective epistemic virtue only if they are discovered under the conditions ...
Zubčić Marko-Luka
doaj +1 more source
The examination of epistemological disagreement of Usulis and Akhbaris on Essential validity of certainty (qat’) [PDF]
مطالعات فقه و حقوق اسلامی, 2022 The epistemology of Principles of Islamic jurisprudence (usul al-fiqh) expressed in Descriptive and normative domains. The descriptive approach discusses about “is” problems and includes Usuli’s and Akhbari’s jurisprudence that will be discussed in this ...
Mohammad Hosein Safaee, Hosein Vale
doaj +1 more source
Against the Equal Weight View in the Epistemology of Disagreement [PDF]
حکمت و فلسفه, 2018 In this paper I propose an argument against the conciliatory view in peer disagreement. One of the most important grounds for conciliatory views is the assumption that the epistemic situation in peer disagreement between two peers is symmetri cal ...
امید کریم زاده
doaj +1 more source
The Epistemic Value of Deep Disagreements
Informal Logic, 2018 In the epistemology of disagreement literature an underdeveloped argument defending the claim that an agent need not conciliate when she becomes aware of epistemic peer disagreement is based on the idea that there are epistemic benefits to be gained from
Kirk Lougheed
doaj +1 more source
The Evidence-Based Argument in Peer Disagreement
Dini Araştırmalar, 2021 The problem of disagreement is one of the most important issues that have been debated in epistemology in recent years, and in particular the peer disagreement. The main question of this problem is what kind of attitude we should
Elif Kütükcü
doaj +1 more source
The Inebriated Myth Tellers or the Sober Observers? Molavi and Shams' Different Views on Shath or Ecstatic Utterance [PDF]
Matn/Pizhūhī-i Adabī, 2023 Although it is mentioned that Rumi and Shams agree on all mystical issues, reflecting on their views shows that they have differences of opinion on some minor issues.
Samaneh Al-Sadat Aghadadi +2 more
doaj +1 more source