Results 21 to 30 of about 165,938,516 (260)
Consensual Decision-Making Among Epistemic Peers [PDF]
, 2009 This paper focuses on the question of how to resolve disagreement, and uses the Lehrer-Wagner model as a formal tool for investigating consensual decision-making.
Martini, Carlo +5 more
core +1 more source
The Philosopher Disagreeing with Oneself: On Feldman’s View about Reasonable Religious Disagreement [PDF]
Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- KalāmīRichard Feldman’s “Reasonable Religious Disagreements” (2011) deploys social epistemology to reject the possibility of reasonable religious peer disagreement.
Zahra Zargar
doaj +1 more source
How to behave rationally in face of disagreement? [PDF]
Analiza i Egzystencja, 2015 Review of: The Epistemology of Disagreement. New Essays ed.
Celina Głogowska
doaj
Introduction: The Epistemology of Disagreement [PDF]
Episteme, 2009 One of the most salient features of forming beliefs in a social context is that people end up disagreeing with one another. This is not just an obvious fact about belief-formation; it raises interesting normative questions, especially when people become aware of the opinions of others. How should my beliefs be affected by the knowledge that others hold
openaire +1 more source
Companions in Guilt Arguments in the Epistemology of Moral Disagreement [PDF]
, 2020 A popular argument is that peer disagreement about controversial moral topics undermines justified moral belief in a way that peer disagreement about non-moral topics does not undermine justified non-moral belief.
Cosker-Rowland, Rach
core +4 more sources
The Asymmetry objection in Rawls's political philosophy: Assessing a solution [PDF]
حکمت و فلسفه, 2017 In this paper, after a short review of the conception of justification in political philosophy, I describe the concept of 'burdens of judgment' in Rawls's political philosophy and show how the effects of the conception prevent people from reaching ...
omid karim zadeh
doaj +1 more source
Epistemic injustice and deepened disagreement
, 2021 Sometimes ordinary disagreements become deep as a result of epistemic injustice. The paper explores a hitherto unnoticed connection between two phenomena that have received ample attention in recent social epistemology: deep disagreement and epistemic ...
Lagewaard, Thirza +1 more
core +1 more source
Plantinga and the Great Pumpkin Revisited from the Perspective of Epistemology of Disagreement [PDF]
Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- KalāmīThe epistemic legitimacy of religious belief, as defended within the framework of Reformed Epistemology (RE), has been the subject of sustained scrutiny since Alvin Plantinga introduced the notion of a sensus divinitatis as a properly basic source of ...
Ghazaleh Hojjati
doaj +1 more source
Rivista di Estetica, 2014 Disagreement is a widespread topic of contemporary philosophy, from dissent as a category of political philosophy to the analysis of disagreement in epistemology. In this paper, I argue that dissent is an ontological category. In order to make this point
Markus Gabriel
doaj +1 more source
The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology
, 2021 As political discourse had been saturated with the ideas of “post-truth”, “fake news”, “epistemic bubbles”, and “truth decay”, it was no surprise that in 2017 The New Scientist declared: “Philosophers of knowledge, your time has come.” Political ...
De Ridder, J., Hannon, M.
core +1 more source