Results 151 to 160 of about 3,275 (194)
XLVIII KONFERENCIJA ETRAN 2004 – prikaz naucno-strucnog skupa –
openaire +1 more source
49. KONFERENCIJA ETRAN 2005 – prikaz naucno-strucnog skupa –
openaire +1 more source
Funding Crises: An Empirical Study of the Paycheck Protection Program
Birdthistle WA, Silver J.
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
1988
Much of the material to be covered in this chapter has been discussed in earlier chapters on ETRAN, EGS and the ITS systems. This chapter explicitly compares and contrasts the codes with the intention of providing some new insights into them. It should be noted that, for the purposes of this chapter, the term ETRAN refers to the original NBS version of
Rogers, D. W.O., Bielajew, A. F.
exaly +3 more sources
Much of the material to be covered in this chapter has been discussed in earlier chapters on ETRAN, EGS and the ITS systems. This chapter explicitly compares and contrasts the codes with the intention of providing some new insights into them. It should be noted that, for the purposes of this chapter, the term ETRAN refers to the original NBS version of
Rogers, D. W.O., Bielajew, A. F.
exaly +3 more sources
ETRAN—R Extension Package for Eye Tracking Results Analysis
Perception, 2015Novel open source R extension package for general-purpose eye tracking results analysis proposed. Now supported features are data loading from SMI eye trackers, different methods of fixations detection, various imaging techniques for raw data, and detected fixations (time sequence, scanpath, heatmap, and dynamic visualization).
Alexander V Zhegallo
exaly +3 more sources
Medical Physics, 1986
For 1–50 MeV electrons incident on a water phantom there are systematic differences in the depth‐dose curves calculated by the Monte Carlo codes EGS and ETRAN (and its descendants SANDYL, CYLTRAN, ACCEPT, and the ITS system). Compared to ETRAN, the EGS code calculates a higher surface dose and a slightly slower dose falloff past the dose maximum.
Rogers, D. W.O., Bielajew, A. F.
exaly +4 more sources
For 1–50 MeV electrons incident on a water phantom there are systematic differences in the depth‐dose curves calculated by the Monte Carlo codes EGS and ETRAN (and its descendants SANDYL, CYLTRAN, ACCEPT, and the ITS system). Compared to ETRAN, the EGS code calculates a higher surface dose and a slightly slower dose falloff past the dose maximum.
Rogers, D. W.O., Bielajew, A. F.
exaly +4 more sources

