Abstract Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reliably prevent death due to life‐threatening arrhythmias; this may become less relevant in people with more severe heart failure who are reaching the end of life (EOL). This review aimed to explore the ICD deactivation process and identify ethical issues, especially around the initiation of ...
Siobhan C. Murray +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Trends in assisted dying among patients with psychiatric disorders and dementia in Belgium: A health registry study. [PDF]
Wels J, Hamarat N.
europepmc +1 more source
Conceptual barriers to palliative sedation: insights from focus group interviews with specialist palliative care professionals. [PDF]
Torvund S +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
In sickness and health: A reflexive thematic analysis of ethical considerations and experiences of owners of cats treated for diabetes mellitus. [PDF]
Rothlin-Zachrisson N +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Paget-like bone remodeling disorder in a red-tailed boa (<i>Boa constrictor constrictor</i>): diagnosis and management. [PDF]
Youn SH +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Physiological glomerular filtration rate and responses to Zeitgeber time and cold stress in C57BL/6 mice. [PDF]
Wang X +9 more
europepmc +1 more source
Case Report: Oral and topical chronic administration of THC-rich and CBD-rich cannabis oil as palliative care in a rescued horse with open wound, sarcoid and chronic pain. [PDF]
Zamith Cunha R +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
[Active voluntary euthanasia].
openaire +1 more source
Related searches:
Active Euthanasia in the Netherlands
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 1989Active euthanasia in the Netherlands remains a topic for both professional and public debate. However, many aspects of the medical practice of active euthanasia remain unclear, and no figures on the actual incidence of this practice exist. Legally, active euthanasia is a criminal offense, but a pattern of jurisprudence has developed since the first ...
openaire +2 more sources
The traditional distinction between active and passive euthanasia requires critical analysis. The conventional doctrine is that there is such an important moral difference between the two that, although the latter is sometimes permissible, the former is always forbidden. This doctrine may be challenged for several reasons.
openaire +2 more sources

