Results 271 to 280 of about 3,135,952 (358)
Abstract Quantitative risk assessments of chemicals are routinely performed using in vivo data from rodents; however, there is growing recognition that non‐animal approaches can be human‐relevant alternatives. There is an urgent need to build confidence in non‐animal alternatives given the international support to reduce the use of animals in toxicity ...
Marc A. Beal+14 more
wiley +1 more source
Does malnutrition play an essential role in developing drug-resistant tuberculosis, and how can it be prevented? [PDF]
Mukhida S, Khan S.
europepmc +1 more source
Microbiological, Epidemiological, and Food Safety Aspects of Enterobacter sakazakii
Angelika Lehner, Roger Stephan
openalex +1 more source
Abstract Exposure levels without appreciable human health risk may be determined by dividing a point of departure on a dose–response curve (e.g., benchmark dose) by a composite adjustment factor (AF). An “effect severity” AF (ESAF) is employed in some regulatory contexts.
Barbara L. Parsons+17 more
wiley +1 more source
Correction: Enhancing soil health through balanced fertilization: a pathway to sustainable agriculture and food security. [PDF]
Xing Y, Xie Y, Wang X.
europepmc +1 more source
Abstract Regulatory genetic toxicology focuses on DNA damage and subsequent gene mutations. However, genotoxic agents can also affect epigenetic marks, and incorporation of epigenetic data into the regulatory framework may thus enhance the accuracy of risk assessment.
Roger Godschalk+4 more
wiley +1 more source
Abstract In human health risk assessment of chemicals and pharmaceuticals, identification of genotoxicity hazard usually starts with a standard battery of in vitro genotoxicity tests, which is needed to cover all genotoxicity endpoints. The individual tests included in the battery are not designed to pick up all endpoints.
Mirjam Luijten+15 more
wiley +1 more source
<i>Bacillus cereus</i> in food safety: a bibliometric analysis. [PDF]
Abdul ME, Pavoni E.
europepmc +1 more source