Results 141 to 150 of about 2,870 (199)
, 2017 Foundationalism, a theory about the structure of epistemic justification, is often criticized for certain excesses despite the fact that these excesses are actually not a part of foundationalism itself but are, instead, unnecessary additions that have on occasion been combined with it.
Michael Bergmann
exaly +4 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
2022
Foundationalism is a view about the structure of knowledge and justification. The heart of the thesis is the claim that if there is any knowledge or justified belief at all, then there is a kind of knowledge and justified belief that does not require inference from something else known or justifiably believed.
Richard Fumerton
exaly +2 more sources
Foundationalism is a view about the structure of knowledge and justification. The heart of the thesis is the claim that if there is any knowledge or justified belief at all, then there is a kind of knowledge and justified belief that does not require inference from something else known or justifiably believed.
Richard Fumerton
exaly +2 more sources
Mosaic: an interdisciplinary critical journal, 2019 Abstract: This essay puts the modern philosopher Alain Badiou’s theory of foundationalism into dialogue with the early modern playwright William Shakespeare’s Hamlet . Doing so reveals a new candidate for Hamlet’s traditionally hard-to-define hamartia —his “tragic mistake”—while providing an opportunity to theorize the notion of tragic foundationalism .
Jeffrey R. Wilson
openaire +2 more sources
2018
Some foundationalists are rationalists who rely on intuition and deduction. Others are empiricists, in a broad sense, and accept observation and induction or abduction or yet other ways to support beliefs by means of other beliefs. What they have in common is that they are all willing to hazard a positive view about what in general makes a belief ...
+4 more sources
Some foundationalists are rationalists who rely on intuition and deduction. Others are empiricists, in a broad sense, and accept observation and induction or abduction or yet other ways to support beliefs by means of other beliefs. What they have in common is that they are all willing to hazard a positive view about what in general makes a belief ...
+4 more sources
Arbitrary Foundations? On Klein’s Objection to Foundationalism [PDF]
Acta Analytica, 2015 This paper evaluates Peter Klein’s objection to foundationalism. According to Klein, foundationalism fails because it allows arbitrariness “at the base.” I first explain that this objection can be interpreted in two ways: either as targeting dialectical ...
Engelsma, Coos +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
Foundationalism and Coherentism Reconsidered
Erkenntnis, 1998Etude du debat sur le fondationnalisme et le coherentisme, le naturalisme et l'anti-naturalisme, opposant M. Schlick et O. Neurath, puis W. V. Quine et D. Davidson. Examinant la defense de Quine developpee par R. Gibson contre Davidson, et examinant la fonction explicative de l'empathie recemment determinee par Quine, l'A.
openaire +2 more sources
1994
Abstract Foundationalist theories of justification attempt to solve the Agrippa problem by finding some way of bringing the infinite regress of reasons to a nonarbitrary halt. This chapter concentrates on Chisholm's attempt to do this. Such a theory faces a double task: the first is to find suitable starting points that do not themselves
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Foundationalist theories of justification attempt to solve the Agrippa problem by finding some way of bringing the infinite regress of reasons to a nonarbitrary halt. This chapter concentrates on Chisholm's attempt to do this. Such a theory faces a double task: the first is to find suitable starting points that do not themselves
openaire +1 more source
Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1982
Epistemological foundationalism has typically been thought to hold that in order to account for human knowledge we must countenance the direct Justification of some specific kind of beliefs, such as one's beliefs to the effect that one is having a certain sensation.
openaire +1 more source
Epistemological foundationalism has typically been thought to hold that in order to account for human knowledge we must countenance the direct Justification of some specific kind of beliefs, such as one's beliefs to the effect that one is having a certain sensation.
openaire +1 more source
Varieties of foundationalism and anti-foundationalism in ethics: a map
2009In his book Vértigos argumentales, Carlos Pereda proposes a classification of foundationalist and anti-foundationalist theories of epistemic justification and suggests that something similar can be done about practical justification. Here I develop a classification of theories of moral justification in the same terms. Finally, I analyze how what Pereda
openaire +2 more sources