Results 171 to 180 of about 12,528 (223)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2022
Foundationalism is a view about the structure of knowledge and justification. The heart of the thesis is the claim that if there is any knowledge or justified belief at all, then there is a kind of knowledge and justified belief that does not require inference from something else known or justifiably believed.
openaire +1 more source
Foundationalism is a view about the structure of knowledge and justification. The heart of the thesis is the claim that if there is any knowledge or justified belief at all, then there is a kind of knowledge and justified belief that does not require inference from something else known or justifiably believed.
openaire +1 more source
2017
Foundationalism, a theory about the structure of epistemic justification, is often criticized for certain excesses despite the fact that these excesses are actually not a part of foundationalism itself but are, instead, unnecessary additions that have on occasion been combined with it.
openaire +2 more sources
Foundationalism, a theory about the structure of epistemic justification, is often criticized for certain excesses despite the fact that these excesses are actually not a part of foundationalism itself but are, instead, unnecessary additions that have on occasion been combined with it.
openaire +2 more sources
1994
Abstract Foundationalist theories of justification attempt to solve the Agrippa problem by finding some way of bringing the infinite regress of reasons to a nonarbitrary halt. This chapter concentrates on Chisholm's attempt to do this. Such a theory faces a double task: the first is to find suitable starting points that do not themselves
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Foundationalist theories of justification attempt to solve the Agrippa problem by finding some way of bringing the infinite regress of reasons to a nonarbitrary halt. This chapter concentrates on Chisholm's attempt to do this. Such a theory faces a double task: the first is to find suitable starting points that do not themselves
openaire +1 more source
Foundationalism and Coherentism Reconsidered
Erkenntnis, 1998Etude du debat sur le fondationnalisme et le coherentisme, le naturalisme et l'anti-naturalisme, opposant M. Schlick et O. Neurath, puis W. V. Quine et D. Davidson. Examinant la defense de Quine developpee par R. Gibson contre Davidson, et examinant la fonction explicative de l'empathie recemment determinee par Quine, l'A.
openaire +2 more sources
Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1982
Epistemological foundationalism has typically been thought to hold that in order to account for human knowledge we must countenance the direct Justification of some specific kind of beliefs, such as one's beliefs to the effect that one is having a certain sensation.
openaire +1 more source
Epistemological foundationalism has typically been thought to hold that in order to account for human knowledge we must countenance the direct Justification of some specific kind of beliefs, such as one's beliefs to the effect that one is having a certain sensation.
openaire +1 more source
1994
Abstract We can say, then, that for Wittgenstein the applicability of doubt is one of the features that defines the language game. This is a complex thought with many ramifications. One is that where doubt is inapplicable we are dealing with matters that do not belong to the language game.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract We can say, then, that for Wittgenstein the applicability of doubt is one of the features that defines the language game. This is a complex thought with many ramifications. One is that where doubt is inapplicable we are dealing with matters that do not belong to the language game.
openaire +1 more source
Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism
Philosophical Books, 2003Book reviewed in this article:M DePaul (ed), Resurrecting Old–Fashioned ...
openaire +1 more source
2002
AbstractThe Reformation did not represent a radical break from the epistemological vision of scripture developed in the Western tradition. Initially, valiant efforts were made to focus on the soteriological significance of scripture as mediating the gospel, but these were quickly overtaken by the need to supply a justification for the new and sometimes
openaire +1 more source
AbstractThe Reformation did not represent a radical break from the epistemological vision of scripture developed in the Western tradition. Initially, valiant efforts were made to focus on the soteriological significance of scripture as mediating the gospel, but these were quickly overtaken by the need to supply a justification for the new and sometimes
openaire +1 more source