Results 191 to 200 of about 14,695 (254)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Siberian Journal of Philosophy
Laurence Bonjour believes that foundationalism is a dead end. Literally all possible reasons for basic beliefs have been analyzed – externalism, the doctrine of the given, and a priori justification.
N. Golovko
semanticscholar +1 more source
Laurence Bonjour believes that foundationalism is a dead end. Literally all possible reasons for basic beliefs have been analyzed – externalism, the doctrine of the given, and a priori justification.
N. Golovko
semanticscholar +1 more source
, 2020
Why is the dialogue among professionals who adopt different perspectives regarding psychopathology so difficult? In this article, we point out that the way we justify the knowledge we use influences to what extent we are open to dialogue. We believe that
David Borges Florsheim, L. Simão
semanticscholar +1 more source
Why is the dialogue among professionals who adopt different perspectives regarding psychopathology so difficult? In this article, we point out that the way we justify the knowledge we use influences to what extent we are open to dialogue. We believe that
David Borges Florsheim, L. Simão
semanticscholar +1 more source
Al-Ghazālī’s Methodological Skepticism and Foundationalism
Journal of Islamic PhilosophyIn this article, I examine al-Ghazālī’s methodological skepticism and its role in establishing foundational knowledge.Despite the considerable scholarly attention given to The Deliverance from Error (al-Munqidh min al-ḍalāl), the foundationalism present ...
N. Mohamed
semanticscholar +1 more source
1994
Abstract Foundationalist theories of justification attempt to solve the Agrippa problem by finding some way of bringing the infinite regress of reasons to a nonarbitrary halt. This chapter concentrates on Chisholm's attempt to do this. Such a theory faces a double task: the first is to find suitable starting points that do not themselves
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Foundationalist theories of justification attempt to solve the Agrippa problem by finding some way of bringing the infinite regress of reasons to a nonarbitrary halt. This chapter concentrates on Chisholm's attempt to do this. Such a theory faces a double task: the first is to find suitable starting points that do not themselves
openaire +1 more source
Foundationalism and Coherentism Reconsidered
Erkenntnis, 1998Etude du debat sur le fondationnalisme et le coherentisme, le naturalisme et l'anti-naturalisme, opposant M. Schlick et O. Neurath, puis W. V. Quine et D. Davidson. Examinant la defense de Quine developpee par R. Gibson contre Davidson, et examinant la fonction explicative de l'empathie recemment determinee par Quine, l'A.
openaire +2 more sources
Metaphysical Foundationalism and Theoretical Unification
Erkenntnis: An International Journal of Scientific Philosophy, 2021Andrew Brenner
semanticscholar +1 more source
Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1982
Epistemological foundationalism has typically been thought to hold that in order to account for human knowledge we must countenance the direct Justification of some specific kind of beliefs, such as one's beliefs to the effect that one is having a certain sensation.
openaire +1 more source
Epistemological foundationalism has typically been thought to hold that in order to account for human knowledge we must countenance the direct Justification of some specific kind of beliefs, such as one's beliefs to the effect that one is having a certain sensation.
openaire +1 more source
Encountering Post-Foundationalism in J.K. Gibson-Graham's Space of Pregnant Negativity
[Un]Grounding, 2021Jens Kaae Fisker
semanticscholar +1 more source
1994
Abstract We can say, then, that for Wittgenstein the applicability of doubt is one of the features that defines the language game. This is a complex thought with many ramifications. One is that where doubt is inapplicable we are dealing with matters that do not belong to the language game.
openaire +1 more source
Abstract We can say, then, that for Wittgenstein the applicability of doubt is one of the features that defines the language game. This is a complex thought with many ramifications. One is that where doubt is inapplicable we are dealing with matters that do not belong to the language game.
openaire +1 more source