Results 151 to 160 of about 30,136 (197)

Induction of apoptosis in frog virus 3-infected cells

open access: yesVirology, 2003
The ability of frog virus 3 (FV3), the type species of the family Iridoviridae, to induce apoptosis was examined by monitoring DNA cleavage, chromatin condensation, and cell-surface expression of phosphotidylserine (PS) in fathead minnow (FHM) and baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells.
V G Chinchar
exaly   +3 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Lipid composition of frog virus 3

Virology, 1974
Abstract The lipid composition of purified frog virus 3 was determined and compared with that of host cells of avian and piscine origin. Unenveloped, infectious icosahedral virions contained approximately 9% lipid, at least 90% of which was phospholipid.
D, Willis, A, Granoff
openaire   +2 more sources

Nongenetic reactivation of frog virus 3 DNA

Virology, 1979
Abstract Fathead minnow cells co-infected with purified frog virus 3 DNA and either ultraviolet light-irradiated virus or a temperature-sensitive mutant at a nonpermissive temperature produced infectious progeny with the genotype of the purified DNA.
D B, Willis, R, Goorha, A, Granoff
openaire   +2 more sources

A low resolution structure of frog virus 3

Virology, 1979
Abstract The structure of frog virus 3, a lipid containing deoxyribovirus, has been investigated with neutron scattering. A diameter of 1580 A is found, larger than previous estimation based on electron microscopy. The lipids are concentrated in a 40-A-thick layer at 85 A inside the virion. The virion is highly hydrated, mostly the large central core
M, Cuillel   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Interaction of Frog Virus 3 with the Cytoskeleton

1985
The eukaryotic cell contains a detergent-insoluble structural framework termed the cytoskeleton (Brown etal. 1976; Lenk etal. 1977; Osborn and Weber 1977; Webster et al. 1978). The principal components of the cytoskeleton are three chemically and morphologically distinct filaments: the microtubules, the intermediate filaments, and the microfilaments ...
K G, Murti, R, Goorha, M, Chen
openaire   +2 more sources

Translation Regulation of Frog Virus 3

1989
Frog virus 3 (FV 3), the amphibian virus the most extensively analyzed belongs to the family Iridoviridae. The study of the multiplication cycle of this virus, isolated by Granoff et al (1966), has revealed several original features such as i) the replication occurs in the nucleus and the cytoplasm of the host cell, ii) the RNA polymerase II is ...
A M Aubertin, L Tondre
exaly   +2 more sources

Amphibian ocular malformation associated with frog virus 3

The Veterinary Journal, 2008
During an on-going amphibian ecology study, a free-ranging American bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) metamorph was captured in a pitfall trap adjacent to a constructed farm pond at the Plateau Research and Education Center (PREC) on the Cumberland Plateau near Crossville, Tennessee, USA.
Elizabeth C, Burton   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Transcription of Frog Virus 3

1990
Frog virus 3 (FV3) genes are expressed in infected cells in an orderly stepwise fashion that resembles the pattern of temporal gene activation that occurs during cellular development. To carry out this sequential and quantitative regulation of transcription, FV3 produces a cascade of trans-acting regulatory proteins that (i) cause a switch-off of host ...
Dawn B. Willis   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

A preliminary translational map of the frog virus 3 genome

Virus Genes, 1994
A preliminary map of the frog virus 3 (FV 3) genome was constructed by hybridization-selection of mRNAs to cloned DNA fragments and translation in reticulocyte lysates. FV 3 mRNAs were hybridized to KpnI, HindIII, and SalI restriction fragments representing the entire FV 3 genome.
P D, Foglesong, D B, Willis
openaire   +2 more sources

Arginine requirement for frog virus 3 development

Virology, 1975
Abstract Arginine-depleted BHK cells did not support the multiplication of Frog Virus 3 but allowed the replication of viral DNA. The recovery of the DNA in the nuclear fraction of the infected cells as well as its sensitivity to DNase led to the conclusion that a defect of the encapsidation process took place.
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy