Results 101 to 110 of about 5,123 (200)
THE GETTIER PROBLEM AND LEGAL PROOF
Legal Theory, 2010 This article explores the relationships between legal proof and fundamental epistemic concepts such as knowledge and justification. A survey of the legal literature reveals a confusing array of seemingly inconsistent proposals and presuppositions regarding these relationships. This article makes two contributions.
openaire +2 more sources
Understanding and scientific progress: lessons from epistemology. [PDF]
Synthese, 2022 Emmerson N.
europepmc +1 more source
Is Gettier"s First Example Flawed? [PDF]
, 2003 The 'Gettier counterexamples' (Gettier 19631) to the\ud tripartite account of propositional knowledge are generally\ud taken to show that not every instance of justified true belief\ud constitutes knowledge. I argue that Gettier's famous first\ud example
Schmidt-Petri, Christoph
core
Challenging the Comparison in Montgomery Between Patients and 'Consumers Exercising Choices'. [PDF]
Med Law Rev, 2021 Jackson E.
europepmc +1 more source
“Putting the linguistic method in its place”: Mackie’s distinction between conceptual and factual analysis [PDF]
, 2019 Early in his career and in critical engagement with ordinary language philosophy, John Mackie developed the roots of a methodology that would be fundamental to his thinking: Mackie argues that we need to clearly separate the conceptual analysis which ...
Lossau, Tammo
core
, 2012 We are living in an increasingly complex world. How are we able to cope with this complexity and the difficulties that arise from it? Can philosophy and art, classified as the two utmost useless and pointless disciplines, have any ...
Wilde, Tine
core