Results 221 to 230 of about 1,591,834 (257)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Time trends in Gleason score distribution among Gleason score 8 and 9–10 cancers

Journal of Clinical Pathology
Reporting of prostate cancer grade has drifted to higher reported grades over the past decades. In prostate cancers diagnosed on needle biopsy of 1 72 112 men reported to The National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden 2000–2020, we also noted a grade shift among high-grade cancers.
Lars Egevad   +6 more
openaire   +4 more sources

Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score Correlation in Heterogenous Tumors

American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2015
When prostate biopsy cores are separately identified in multiple containers, current recommendations are to grade each specimen individually. For treatment algorithms, the highest Gleason score (HGS) is typically used as the overall score, even if a lower score predominates.
Arias-Stella, Javier A. 3rd   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Commentary on Comparison of biochemical relapse-free survival between primary Gleason score 3 and primary Gleason score 4 for biopsy Gleason score 7 prostate cancer

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 2009
To determine whether the primary grade (PG) of biopsy Gleason score (GS) 7 prostate cancer (CaP) was predictive for biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS). Most of the present data regarding the PG of GS7 CaP refer to surgical specimens. Our goal was to determine whether the biopsy GS used at the time of medical decision making predicted for the ...
openaire   +1 more source

IS THE BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE RELIABLY PREDICTIVE FOR THE GLEASON SCORE OF THE WHOLE PROSTATE?

European Urology Supplements, 2008
M. Sonnleithner   +19 more
openaire   +1 more source

Histopathological Ratios to Predict Gleason Score Agreement between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy

Diagnostics, 2021
Marco Dell'Aquila   +2 more
exaly  

[Gleason's score: update in 2008].

Annales de pathologie, 2009
The histological grading system of prostate cancer proposed by David Gleason in 1966 remains, more than 40 years after its princeps use, an essential tool of communication between the pathologists and urologists. We present here the principal modifications of this score proposed in 2005 by the International Society of Uropathology.
openaire   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy