Results 21 to 30 of about 10,015 (246)

Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness [PDF]

open access: gold, 2017
AIM: To determine the effects of peripheral corneal thickness (PCT) on dynamic contour tonometry(DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). METHODS: A cross-sectional study.
Borrego Sanz, Lara   +8 more
core   +4 more sources

Comparison of ICare and IOPen vs Goldmann applanation tonometry according to international standards 8612 in glaucoma patients [PDF]

open access: yesInternational Journal of Ophthalmology, 2016
AIM: To compare IOPen and ICare rebound tonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) according to International Standards Organization (ISO) 8612 criteria. METHODS: Totally 191 eyes (n=107 individuals) were included.
Milena Pahlitzsch   +6 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry following Trabeculectomy

open access: yesJournal of Ophthalmology, 2010
Background. To evaluate differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT) and Dynamic Controur Tonometry (DCT) following trabeculectomy. Methods. Thirty eight glaucomatous eyes with a history of trabeculectomy (Trabeculectomy group, TG), 20 eyes ...
Efstathios T. Detorakis   +3 more
doaj   +3 more sources

Evaluation of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in keratoconus

open access: yesJournal of Optometry, 2017
Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the rebound tonometry (RT), dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in keratoconic corneas and to investigate the effects of central corneal ...
Fatih Özcura   +3 more
doaj   +3 more sources

Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Icare Rebound Tonometry in Eyes of Varied Corneal Thickness

open access: hybridBeyoglu Eye Journal, 2017
INTRODUCTION[|]The aim of the present study was to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) level as measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Icare rebound tonometry (RBT; Icare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland) in patients with varied central corneal
Isil Pasaoglu   +7 more
doaj   +3 more sources

A comparison of the NCT Reichert R7 with Goldmann applanation tonometry and the Reichert ocular response analyzer [PDF]

open access: yesOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2011
P>Purpose:The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) values from the new non-contact tonometer (NCT) Reichert R7 by comparing results with those from Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and the Reichert Ocular ...
Jorge M M Jorge   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Goldmann applanation tonometry versus non-contact tonometry: a comparative study

open access: diamondInternational Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 2016
Background: Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is a routine procedure in complete ophthalmologic examination and finds importance in diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma. Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry, though age old, are still widely used methods of measuring IOP, especially in developing countries like India.
Lipi Chakrabarty
openalex   +3 more sources

Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry – a comparative study [PDF]

open access: yesActa Ophthalmologica, 2008
Abstract.Purpose:  To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), to evaluate the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT) and curvature on IOP measurement and to estimate the intra‐observer variability.Methods:  A prospective, single‐centre study of 150 eyes with a wide range of ...
Gauti Jóhannesson   +2 more
exaly   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy