Results 171 to 180 of about 27,445 (197)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 2010
To determine the influence of refractive surgery on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using an iCare rebound tonometer and a Goldmann applanation tonometer.School of Optometry, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.Intraocular pressure was measured using the rebound tonometer and applanation tonometer before and 1 month ...
Andrew K C, Lam   +7 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Comparison of the Icare rebound tonometry with the Goldmann applanation tonometry in a pediatric population

Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2015
We report the results of a comparative study at a single center on 214 eyes of 109 pediatric patients in whom IOP was measured using the Icare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Measurements from the two modalities demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.83 (P < 0.001), with Icare measuring on average 1.38 mm Hg higher.
Florin, Grigorian   +5 more
openaire   +2 more sources

A Clinical Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry Versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina, 2010
Background and Objective: To compare the intraocular pressures (IOP) obtained with dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and to determine the dependency of both devices on corneal structure.
Baykara, MEHMET   +3 more
openaire   +3 more sources

[A comparison of rebound tonometry (ICare) with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2007
Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry (PASCAL) are two well established slit lamp mounted tonometric methods. Intraocular pressure measurement in bedridden patients and children is often only possible using hand held tonometers (TonoPenXL, Perkins tonometer, Draeger tonometer).
W, Schreiber   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in pseudoexfoliation syndrome

Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 2010
AbstractPurpose:  To evaluate differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT) and Dynamic Controur Tonometry (DCT) in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX).Methods:  Thirty‐eight patients (38 eyes) with PEX in both eyes (pseudoexfoliative group, PG) as well as 19 patients (19 eyes) without PEX in either eye (control group, CG), were ...
Emilia, Grammenandi   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

A comparison of Perkins and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Journal of the American Optometric Association, 1987
In a study of 103 eyes, the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) was compared between the Perkins hand-held tonometer and the Goldmann slit lamp mounted tonometer. IOP readings from the two instruments were highly correlated (+0.91). Advantages inherent to the Perkins design are also discussed.
J S, Baskett, T M, Goen, J E, Terry
openaire   +1 more source

[Theoretical basis of goldmann applanation tonometry].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde, 2005
For more than 50 years Goldmann applanation tonometry has been the internationally accepted method for measuring intraocular pressure. In Goldmann applanation tonometry, however, some basic physical properties are oversimplified and the method has some flaws and restrictions.
W, Wiegand, B, Schroeder, A, Hager
openaire   +1 more source

Goldmann applanation tonometry

2007
Frank Eperjesi   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Goldmann Applanation Tonometry After PRK and LASIK

Cornea, 2001
ROSA N.   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Using Deep Learning to Automate Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Readings

Ophthalmology, 2020
Ryan T Yanagihara, Philip P Chen, Yue Wu
exaly  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy