Results 171 to 180 of about 5,232 (217)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Group Responsibility

2022
Abstract Are groups ever capable of bearing responsibility, over and above their individual members? This chapter discusses and defends the view that certain organized collectives—namely, those that qualify as group moral agents—can be held responsible for their actions, and that group responsibility is not reducible to individual ...
openaire   +1 more source

Group defence and the predator’s functional response

Journal of Mathematical Biology, 2012
We derive from first principles the functional response of the predator and the reproduction rate of the prey in the case that the prey form groups as a defence against the predator and the latter captures only single prey. We also give some examples of the resulting predator-prey population dynamics.
Gyllenberg Mats, Geritz Stefanus
openaire   +2 more sources

LIST AND PETTIT ON GROUP AGENCY AND GROUP RESPONSIBILITY

University of Toronto Law Journal, 2014
Criminal liability for corporations may seem quixotic insofar as corporations appear neither to have the same cognitive capacities as individuals, nor to be capable of acting except through the efforts of the individuals who constitute them. One way of clarifying the basis of corporate criminal liability is to consider whether and how corporations ...
openaire   +1 more source

Group Agents and Their Responsibility

The Journal of Ethics, 2016
Group agents are able to act but are not literally agents. Some group agents, e.g., we-mode groups and corporations, can, however, be regarded as functional group agents that do not have “intrinsic” mental states and phenomenal features comparable to what their individual members on biological and psychological grounds have.
Mäkelä Pekka Antero, Tuomela Raimo
openaire   +1 more source

Group Responsibility

2007
AbstractThe main idea about group responsibility is that we-mode groups, namely, groups in which a substantial number of the members are collectively committed to the group (to its ethos and to each other concerning ethos promotion), are normatively responsible—in a control-based sense of responsibility—for their actions and for what their members ...
openaire   +1 more source

GROUP DIFFERENCES IN ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC RESPONSE

American Journal of Psychiatry, 1953
Group differences between psychotics and normals, males and females, were found in 40 subjects in one area of heart action. "Pleasant" word stimuli distinguished the psychotics, whereas a startle stimulus distinguished the sexes.
openaire   +2 more sources

Crisis: Group Response to Emergency

Journal of Communication, 1971
This descriptive and exploratory paper has as its objective the analysis of group interaction during a crisis and the generation of hypotheses about crisis interaction. Hypotheses are suggested in the areas of verbal and nonverbal interaction, leadership style and fluctuation, and the volume of task and process communication.
openaire   +2 more sources

Group Response‐Adaptive Randomization With Delayed and Missing Responses

Statistics in Medicine
ABSTRACTResponse‐adaptive randomization (RAR) procedures have been extensively studied in the literature, but most of the procedures rely on updating the randomization after each response, which is impractical in many clinical trials. In this article, we propose a new family of RAR procedures that dynamically update based on the responses of a group of
Guannan Zhai   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Multinomially Grouped Response Times for the Quantal Response Bioassay

Biometrics, 1958
where x and t are the values of the dose and time metameters and y is say the logit of the response at that dose and time and where in some cases a may be assumed to be zero. Since the response numbers are accumulated for the successive times within a dose, the observed y values are not independent within doses. This introduces some complexity into the
White, Robert F., Graca, Joseph G.
openaire   +1 more source

Group instability and the social response to methamphetamine

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1974
Abstract The effects of methamphetamine on body contact and social distances in stable (familiar) and unstable (unfamiliar) groups of rats were investigated. Although there was no difference in body contact in the stable and unstable saline groups, methamphetamine reduced body contact significantly more in the unstable group than it did for its ...
L A, Syme, G J, Syme
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy