Results 21 to 30 of about 2,060,229 (274)

Addendum/Erratum for `Searching for Invisible and Almost Invisible Particles at $\bf e^+e^-$ Colliders' [hep-ph/9512230] and `A Non-Standard String/SUSY Scenario and its Phenomenological Implications' [hep-ph/9607421]

open access: green, 1999
4 pages, 1 figure, latex. In this slight revision of the addendum, we further refine our discussion of small but possibly observable chargino path ...
Chen, C. -H., Drees, M., Gunion, J. F.
openaire   +4 more sources

Comments on the reach of INO experiment: JHEP 1304, 009 (2013) and arXiv:1303.2534 [hep-ph]

open access: green, 2013
In JHEP {\bf 1304}, 009 (2013) and arXiv:1303.2534 [hep-ph] the {\it reach of INO experiment} for determination of neutrino mass hierarchy and the sensitivity to both $ m_{32}^2$ and $ _{23}$ have been reported, which are significantly underestimated and drastically different from earlier studies JHEP {\bf 1107}, 048 (2011), Phys. Rev.
Abhijit Samanta
  +6 more sources

Up--dating for the paper ``The mass of the Higgs boson in the Standard Model from precision tests'' (MPI--Ph/95--39, hep-ph/9505308)

open access: green, 1995
6 pages, LaTeX; 3 postscript figures in a separate uuencoded Z-compressed ...
Chankowski, P. H., Pokorski, S.
openaire   +4 more sources

Calculations of the Imaginary Part of Gauge Boson's Wave-function Renormalization Constants and the Modification of hep-ph/0301090

open access: green, 2003
We have calculated the imaginary part of W and Z gauge boson's wave-function renormalization constants (wrc.) in the complex-pole mass renormalization scheme and made atonement for the paper hep-ph/0301090 where the imaginary part of gauge boson's wrc. has been ignored in the second renormalization scheme in section 4.
Yong Zhou
openaire   +4 more sources

Comment on the paper: ``Feynman-Schwinger representation approach to nonperturbative physics'' by C. Savkli et al. [Phys. Rev. C 60, 055210 (1999), hep-ph/9906211]

open access: green, 1999
We point out that the scalar Wick-Cutkosky model (with $ ^2 $ interaction) used in this study has been known for a long time to be unstable. However, the numerical results presented in this paper do not show any sign of this instability which casts some doubt on their reliability. We compare with the worldline variational approach.
Rosenfelder, R., Schreiber, A. W.
openaire   +4 more sources

Comment on arXiv:1408.0288v2 [hep-ph] and Phys. Rev. D 90, 085017 (2014), "A new evaluation of the antiproton production cross section for cosmic ray studies", Mattia di Mauro et al

open access: green, 2018
The referred-to paper on antiproton production contains two errors: an error in the value reported for one of the fit parameters and an error in units. I give the errors and the corrected values when possible.
Robert Bernstein
openaire   +4 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy