Results 141 to 150 of about 2,545 (184)
Review of Stephen Yablo, Thoughts: Papers on Mind, Meaning, and Modality (Philosophical Papers, Volume 1) [PDF]
, 2009 Leuenberger, S.
core
History of Philosophy Quarterly, 2022 Abstract Although philosophers sympathetic to Peter Strawson's view in “Freedom and Resentment” tend to be compatibilists, they need not be. This paper develops a recent suggestion that Strawson's view can be read as consistent with libertarianism by showing that an important distinction Strawson makes between personal and moral reactive
Nicholas Sars
openalex +2 more sources
Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 2013 The consequence argument attempts to show that incompatibilism is true by showing that if there is determinism, then we never had, have or will have any choice about anything. Much of the debate on the consequence argument has focused on the “beta” transfer principle, and its improvements.
Alexander R. Pruss
openalex +2 more sources
, 2003 AbstractA basic characterization of free will is offered, and common beliefs about the value of free will are reviewed. Two incompatibilist theses are distinguished: broad incompatibilism holds that both free will and moral responsibility are incompatible with determinism, while merely narrow incompatibilism holds that free will requires indeterminism ...
Randolph Clarke
openalex +2 more sources
How Not to Argue for Incompatibilism
Erkenntnis, 2003 zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Michael Kremer
openalex +3 more sources
Incompatibilism’s Threat to Worldly Value: Source Incompatibilism, Desert, and Pleasure
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2009 Ishtiyaque Haji
openalex +2 more sources
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 2022
P. van Inwagen famously offered three precise versions of the so-called Consequence Argument for incompatibilism. The third of these essentially employs the notion of an agent’s having a choice with respect to a proposition. In this paper, I offer two intuitively attractive accounts of this notion in terms of the explanatory connective ‘because’ and ...
openaire +2 more sources
P. van Inwagen famously offered three precise versions of the so-called Consequence Argument for incompatibilism. The third of these essentially employs the notion of an agent’s having a choice with respect to a proposition. In this paper, I offer two intuitively attractive accounts of this notion in terms of the explanatory connective ‘because’ and ...
openaire +2 more sources