Results 31 to 40 of about 177 (161)

The sense of agency does not evidence regulative control

Filosofia Unisinos, 2021
Libertarians assume that the sense of agency supports their belief in the agent’s ability to have done otherwise; however, they do not present arguments in favor of their assumption beyond introspection.
Beatriz Sorrentino Marques
doaj   +1 more source

How to make beta better [PDF]

Belgrade Philosophical Annual
In this paper, I appeal to a quantified counterfactual logic in order to argue that van Inwagen's new version of the Consequence Argument, unlike the original version of his argument, is logically valid.
Hausmann Marco
doaj   +1 more source

Free will and self expression: A compatibilist garden of forking paths

, 2023
Philosophical Issues, Volume 33, Issue 1, Page 299-313, October 2023.
Robyn Repko Waller
wiley   +1 more source

Sadraies on Divine Free-Will: a Critical Survey [PDF]

حکمت معاصر, 2014
Are ‘Divine freedom’ and ‘necessity of His will and action’ compatible? There are two different answers to this theological question: compatibilism, which confirms the compatibility of these doctrines, and incompatibilism, which claims that those beliefs
Saeed Moghadas, ahmad behashti
doaj  

Bernard Williams's Different View of Moral Responsibility [PDF]

Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī, 2020
The present article studies Bernard Williams's view on moral responsibility using an analytical-critical approach. The discussion of moral responsibility includes the definition, conditions, and problem of moral responsibility.
Fatemeh TamaddonFard
doaj   +1 more source

Compatibilist's Challenges on Encountering with the Zygote Argument of Manipulation [PDF]

Journal of Philosophical Investigations
In compatibilists believe that we cannot act freely and be morally responsible for an action in a deterministic world, while compatibilists don’t deny the possibility of free action and moral responsibility for the agent, and they believe that we can ...
Zahra Khazaei, Sara Sotoudehnia, Mohsen Javadi   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Scepticism Without Consequence? On Hard Incompatibilism and Its Normative Recommendations

Theoria, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Free will scepticism about moral responsibility denies that human agents possess the kind of control required for basic desert moral responsibility. This position is often taken to have substantive normative implications, including the rejection of retributive punishment and support for reformist approaches to criminal justice.
Thomas Nys, Gijs van Donselaar
wiley   +1 more source

Compatibilism and Incompatibilism in Social Cognition [PDF]

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016
Compatibilism is the view that determinism is compatible with acting freely and being morally responsible. Incompatibilism is the opposite view. It is often claimed that compatibilism or incompatibilism is a natural part of ordinary social cognition.
openaire   +2 more sources

Deflating and Debunking: A Case for Hard‐Line Structuralism

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Volume 113, Issue 1, Page 169-181, July 2026.
ABSTRACT Can manipulated agents be morally responsible for what they do? According to hard‐line structuralism, yes. On this view, manipulated agents are responsible in virtue of satisfying the relevant structural conditions taken to be sufficient for responsibility.
Chris Cho
wiley   +1 more source

Slow switching and the psychology of memory

Mind &Language, Volume 41, Issue 3, Page 383-401, June 2026.
This article presents elements of a theory of the representational contents of episodic memory and a new perspective on the relationship between memory and self‐knowledge. These two interrelated outcomes fall out of a novel naturalistic treatment of the debate concerning the compatibility between semantic externalism and a priori self‐knowledge.
Jay Richardson
wiley   +1 more source