Results 31 to 40 of about 173 (155)
The sense of agency does not evidence regulative control
Filosofia Unisinos, 2021 Libertarians assume that the sense of agency supports their belief in the agent’s ability to have done otherwise; however, they do not present arguments in favor of their assumption beyond introspection.
Beatriz Sorrentino Marques
doaj +1 more source
Free will and self expression: A compatibilist garden of forking paths
, 2023 Philosophical Issues, Volume 33, Issue 1, Page 299-313, October 2023.
Robyn Repko Waller
wiley +1 more source
Belgrade Philosophical AnnualIn this paper, I appeal to a quantified counterfactual logic in order to argue that van Inwagen's new version of the Consequence Argument, unlike the original version of his argument, is logically valid.
Hausmann Marco
doaj +1 more source
Sadraies on Divine Free-Will: a Critical Survey [PDF]
حکمت معاصر, 2014 Are ‘Divine freedom’ and ‘necessity of His will and action’ compatible? There are two different answers to this theological question: compatibilism, which confirms the compatibility of these doctrines, and incompatibilism, which claims that those beliefs
Saeed Moghadas, ahmad behashti
doaj
Bernard Williams's Different View of Moral Responsibility [PDF]
Pizhūhish/hā-yi Falsafī- Kalāmī, 2020 The present article studies Bernard Williams's view on moral responsibility using an analytical-critical approach. The discussion of moral responsibility includes the definition, conditions, and problem of moral responsibility.
Fatemeh TamaddonFard
doaj +1 more source
The consequences of incompatibilism
, 2023 Incompatibilism about responsibility and determinism is sometimes directly construed as the thesis that if we found out that determinism is true, we would have to give up the reactive attitudes. Call this “the consequence”. I argue that this is a mistake: The strict modal thesis does not entail the consequence.
openaire +2 more sources
Compatibilism and Incompatibilism in Social Cognition [PDF]
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016 Compatibilism is the view that determinism is compatible with acting freely and being morally responsible. Incompatibilism is the opposite view. It is often claimed that compatibilism or incompatibilism is a natural part of ordinary social cognition.
openaire +2 more sources
Compatibilist's Challenges on Encountering with the Zygote Argument of Manipulation [PDF]
Journal of Philosophical InvestigationsIn compatibilists believe that we cannot act freely and be morally responsible for an action in a deterministic world, while compatibilists don’t deny the possibility of free action and moral responsibility for the agent, and they believe that we can ...
Zahra Khazaei +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Deflating and Debunking: A Case for Hard‐Line Structuralism
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Volume 113, Issue 1, Page 169-181, July 2026.ABSTRACT Can manipulated agents be morally responsible for what they do? According to hard‐line structuralism, yes. On this view, manipulated agents are responsible in virtue of satisfying the relevant structural conditions taken to be sufficient for responsibility.
Chris Cho
wiley +1 more source