Results 51 to 60 of about 177 (161)

Two intuitions about free will—Some afterthoughts

open access: yesTheoria, Volume 91, Issue 2, April 2025.
Abstract In 2014, Christian List and I published a paper that delineated our view regarding what it takes for an agent to act freely. We suggested that this requires the action to be endorsed by the agent and caused by this endorsement and yet not be necessitated.
Wlodek Rabinowicz
wiley   +1 more source

Foreknowledge and causal determinism

open access: yesTheoria, Volume 91, Issue 2, April 2025.
Abstract I evaluate Patrick Todd's critique of the idea accepted by many, including (in contemporary philosophy) Nelson Pike and John Martin Fischer, that there can be non‐causal constraints on human actions (including basic actions). I suggest that Todd's critical reflections, although illuminating, are not persuasive.
John Martin Fischer
wiley   +1 more source

The Problems of Free Will and Moral Responsibility in Buddhist Ethics

open access: yesRUDN Journal of Philosophy
At the end of the 20th century, a discipline of Buddhist ethics was formed in English-speaking countries, within the framework of which a community of closely interacting researchers is engaged in the comprehension and systematization of ethical ...
Vlada A. Volkova
doaj   +1 more source

Supervenient fixity and agential possibilities

open access: yesTheoria, Volume 90, Issue 4, Page 400-416, August 2024.
Abstract One of the central problems within the free will debate lies in the apparent incompatibility of an agent's ability to do otherwise and determinism. Recently, compatibilist libertarianism was proposed as an actualist position intended to finally reconcile both.
Maria Sekatskaya, Alexander Gebharter
wiley   +1 more source

Mobile health technology and empowerment

open access: yesBioethics, Volume 38, Issue 6, Page 481-490, July 2024.
Abstract Mobile Health (m‐health) technologies, such as wearables, apps, and smartwatches, are increasingly viewed as tools for improving health and well‐being. In particular, such technologies are conceptualized as means for laypersons to master their own health, by becoming “engaged” and “empowered” “managers” of their bodies and minds.
Karola V. Kreitmair
wiley   +1 more source

Response to Dennett on Free Will Skepticism

open access: yesRivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 2017
What is at stake in the debate between those, such as Sam Harris and me, who contend that we would lack free will on the supposition that we are causally determined agents, and those that defend the claim that we might then retain free will, such as ...
Derk Pereboom
doaj   +1 more source

Discordant belief and principle of necessity [PDF]

open access: yesحکمت و فلسفه, 2015
The transfer of necessity principle (the consequence of anecessary issue which itself is also necessary) is seen as the base of consequent argument vindicating the belief of incompatibility of free will with causal determinism.
Zeynab Abolghasemi Dehaghani   +1 more
doaj  

Indirect compatibilism

open access: yesNoûs, Volume 58, Issue 1, Page 141-162, March 2024.
Abstract In this paper I will introduce a new compatibilist account of free action: indirect conscious control compatibilism, or just indirect compatibilism for short. On this account, actions are free either when they are caused by compatibilist‐friendly conscious psychological processes, or else by sub‐personal level processes influenced in ...
Andrew J. Latham
wiley   +1 more source

Locating Rights in the Afro-Communitarian Scheme: Testing the Compatibilist Argument

open access: yesArụmarụka, 2022
In this paper, I explore the relationship between individual rights and duties within the Afro-communitarian discourse in African political philosophy. The notion of individual rights is prominent in modern African political philosophy, which is usually ...
Tosin Adeate
doaj   +1 more source

Obligation Incompatibilism and Blameworthiness

open access: yesPhilosophical Papers, 2021
Obligation incompatibilism is the view that determinism precludes moral obligation. I argue for the following. (i) Two principles, ‘ought’ implies ‘can’ and ‘ought not’ is equivalent to ‘impermissible’, generate a powerful argument for obligation incompatibilism.
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy