Results 11 to 20 of about 516,622 (298)
Actionability Judgments Cause Knowledge Judgments [PDF]
Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 2016 Researchers recently demonstrated a strong direct relationship between judgments about what a person knows and judgments about how a person should act. But it remains unknown whether actionability judgments cause knowledge judgments, or knowledge judgments cause actionability judgments.
John Turri +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
Neural Network Acceptability Judgments [PDF]
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018 This paper investigates the ability of artificial neural networks to judge the grammatical acceptability of a sentence, with the goal of testing their linguistic competence.
Alex Warstadt +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
What makes a good conversation? How controllable attributes affect human judgments [PDF]
North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019 A good conversation requires balance – between simplicity and detail; staying on topic and changing it; asking questions and answering them. Although dialogue agents are commonly evaluated via human judgments of overall quality, the relationship between ...
A. See +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
A counterfactual simulation model of causal judgments for physical events.
Psychology Review, 2020 How do people make causal judgments about physical events? We introduce the counterfactual simulation model (CSM) which predicts causal judgments in physical settings by comparing what actually happened with what would have happened in relevant ...
Tobias Gerstenberg +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
On the complexity of traffic judges' decisions
Judgment and Decision Making, 2008 Professional judges in traffic courts sentence many hundreds of offenders per year. Using 639 case files from archives, we compared the Matching Heuristic (MH) to compensatory, weighing algorithms (WM).
David Leiser, Dov-Ron Schatzberg
doaj +1 more source
Epistemic Modality: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Epistemic Markers in EU and Polish Judgments
Comparative Legilinguistics, 2020 The aim of this paper is to establish the repertoire and distribution of verbal and adverbial exponents of epistemic modality in English- and Polish-language judgments passed by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) and non-translated judgments passed by
Koźbiał Dariusz
doaj +1 more source
The IART System for Race Walking: Experience with World-Class Olympic Race Walkers
Proceedings, 2020 Race walking is a discipline in which the best chronometric performance is constrained by infringements. Currently, the judgment and training of race walkers is entrusted to subjective observations made by judges.
Teodorico Caporaso +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia, 2020 In view of the difficulties encountered by certain European attempts to guarantee the quality of the public service of justice in the different European States, the question of the language in which law is expressed naturally arises.
Simina Mastacan, Marta Sobieszewska
doaj +3 more sources
Does anyone know the answer to that question? Individual differences in judging answerability
Frontiers in Psychology, 2016 Occasionally people may attempt to judge whether a question can be answered today, or if not, if it can be answered in the future. For example, a person may consider whether enough is known about the dangers of living close to a nuclear plant, or to a ...
Bodil S. A. Karlsson +2 more
doaj +1 more source
METEOR: An Automatic Metric for MT Evaluation with High Levels of Correlation with Human Judgments
WMT@ACL, 2007 Meteor is an automatic metric for Machine Translation evaluation which has been demonstrated to have high levels of correlation with human judgments of translation quality, significantly outperforming the more commonly used Bleu metric.
A. Lavie, Abhaya Agarwal
semanticscholar +1 more source