Results 81 to 90 of about 114,103,231 (189)
Index of Authors and Co‐Authors [PDF]
United European Gastroenterology Journal, Volume 12, Issue S8, Page 1361-1403, October 2024.
europepmc +2 more sources
Judgments of Morality in War: Commentary on Watkins (2020). [PDF]
Frankfurt SB, Coady A.
europepmc +1 more source
Practical pacifism, jus in bello, and citizen responsibility: the case of Iraq [PDF]
This article discusses how ordinary citizens might apply principles of jus in bello. It reaches a sceptical conclusion about citizens’ capacity to apply these principles and connects this with a practical approach to pacifism or, what might also be ...
Fiala, Andrew
core
Proxy battles in just war theory:Jus in Bello, the site of justice, and feasibility constraints
Orthodox just war theorists argue that the principles governing conduct in war—jus in bello—broadly track the current laws of armed conflict. Revisionists deny this.
Valentini, Laura; id_orcid, Lazar, Seth
core +1 more source
Nuclear Threats Under International Law Part I: The Legal Framework
The international legal status of threats to use nuclear weapons is uncertain. In this article, we map existing prohibitions against nuclear threats at international law and seek to explain the scope and remit of such laws.
Anna Hood, Monique Cormier
doaj +1 more source
Algunas cuestiones planteadas por el asesinato selectivo del general Soleimani
El asesinato del general iraní, Qasem Soleimani, el 3 de enero de 2020 por un ataque aéreo estadounidense con dron, plantea algunas cuestiones de derecho internacional.
Mateo Fornari
doaj
When Enhancements need Therapy: disenhancements, Iatrogenesis, and the responsibility of Military Institutions. [PDF]
Henschke A.
europepmc +1 more source
[The armed forces health service in the face of major health risks]. [PDF]
Boulliat C, Callu MF, Massoubre B.
europepmc +1 more source
Resolving responsibility gaps for lethal autonomous weapon systems. [PDF]
Smith PT.
europepmc +1 more source
It has long been contended that jus in bello has to be kept strictly separated from jus ad bellum, despite both being concurrently applicable to regulate situations of armed conflict.
Collart, Nathan
core

