Results 251 to 260 of about 4,728 (294)

Palliative care-based arguments against assisted dying. [PDF]

Bioethics
Colburn B.
europepmc   +1 more source

Argumentação jurídica e fundamentação em direito: um estudo de caso nas sentenças que decidem sobre a indenização pelo assédio moral no ambiente de trabalho = Legal argumentation and reasoning in law: a case study in the sentences that decide on compensation for moral harassment in the workplace

Giovanilza Maria Pessôa de Oliveira
openalex   +1 more source

Limits of legal argumentation

, 2017
openaire   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Generating legal arguments

Knowledge-Based Systems, 1989
Legal reasoning in the Common Law system has elements of reasoning by analogy, of reasoning from example, and certain characteristics which are unique. A legal expert system must provide a sophisticated level of justification for its advice, for the justification is the system's most important product.
Alan L. Tyree, Graham Greenleaf, Andrew Mobray   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Argumentation in Legal Reasoning

2009
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than deduce the consequences from a precisely stated set of facts and legal rules. This immediately makes many lawyers sceptical about the usefulness of such systems: this mechanical approach seems to leave out most of what is important in legal reasoning.
Bench Capon T., Prakken H., SARTOR, GIOVANNI   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Temporal accommodation of legal argumentation

Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2011
This paper proposes to integrate an argumentation framework with techniques from Temporal Constraint Satisfaction. Temporal constraints are thus embedded into legal argumentation to account for temporal aspects of legal reasoning. Through the accommodation of temporal constraints, the validity of arguments and of their conclusions is made relative to ...
RIVERET, REGIS, ROTOLO, ANTONINO, CONTISSA, GIUSEPPE, SARTOR, GIOVANNI, W. Vasconcelos   +4 more
openaire   +1 more source

Legal Argumentation

2004
Abstract Argumentation is another form with two sides. The issue here, of course, is not the difference between good arguments and bad, between more convincing arguments and less convincing arguments, for they are already arguments. In order to understand argumentation it is important, first of all, to see what arguments cannot achieve ...
openaire   +1 more source

Presumptions in Legal Argumentation

Ratio Juris, 2012
AbstractIn this paper a theoretical definition that helps to explain how the logical structure of legal presumptions is constructed by applying the Carneades model of argumentation developed in artificial intelligence. Using this model, it is shown how presumptions work as devices used in evidentiary reasoning in law in the event of a lack of evidence ...
FABRIZIO MACAGNO, DOUGLAS WALTON
openaire   +1 more source