Results 141 to 150 of about 854,026 (193)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Philosophia Christi, 2021
Our pretheoretic sense of the relation of logical consequence arises from our experience of deductive inference. By ignoring the priority of inference and failing to provide an account of the ontological grounds of the conceptual experience and of the modal and truth elements in the statement of our pretheoretical sense, informal and technical accounts
openaire +1 more source
Our pretheoretic sense of the relation of logical consequence arises from our experience of deductive inference. By ignoring the priority of inference and failing to provide an account of the ontological grounds of the conceptual experience and of the modal and truth elements in the statement of our pretheoretical sense, informal and technical accounts
openaire +1 more source
Logical Pluralism and Logical Consequence
2023Logical pluralism is the view that there is more than one correct logic. This is not necessarily a controversial claim but in its most exciting formulations, pluralism extends to logics that have typically been considered rival accounts of logical consequence – to logics, that is, which adopt seemingly contradictory views about basic logical laws or ...
openaire +2 more sources
Logical Consequence and the Paradoxes
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2013zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Mares E., PAOLI, FRANCESCO
openaire +2 more sources
Conceptions of Logical Consequence
2022AbstractDebates about logical consequence are typically motivated by the desire to capture ‘the intuitive concept of logical consequence’. The authors of One True Logic believe that there is a mistake here from the start. There is no single, well-behaved target for our precise definitions of logical consequence but rather a historical tangle of ...
Owen Griffiths, A.C. Paseau
openaire +1 more source
Paraconsistent Logical Consequence
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 1998ABSTRACT The concept of paraconsistent logical consequence is usually negatively defined as a validity semantics in which not every sentences is deducible or in which inferential explosion does not occur. Paraconsistency has been negatively characterized in this way because paraconsistent logics have been designed specifically to avoid the ...
openaire +1 more source
2005
AbstractThis chapter explores the concept of logical consequence and defends logical pluralism. Logic, in the core tradition, involves the study of formal languages. However, the primary aim is to consider such languages as interpreted: languages which may be used either directly to make assertions and denials, or to analyse natural languages.
openaire +1 more source
AbstractThis chapter explores the concept of logical consequence and defends logical pluralism. Logic, in the core tradition, involves the study of formal languages. However, the primary aim is to consider such languages as interpreted: languages which may be used either directly to make assertions and denials, or to analyse natural languages.
openaire +1 more source
Logical Consequence in Avicenna’s Theory
Logica Universalis, 2018An in-depth look at Avicenna's notion of logical consequence, mostly in the context of syllogism (Avicenna's syllogism, however, ``is much wider than the Aristotelian kind of syllogisms, because it can be both categorical and hypothetical, and can contain all kinds of propositions, from conditional and conjunctive ones to several kinds of disjunctive ...
openaire +2 more sources
REREADING TARSKI ON LOGICAL CONSEQUENCE
The Review of Symbolic Logic, 2009I argue that recent defenses of the view that in 1936 Tarski required all interpretations of a language to share one same domain of quantification are based on misinterpretations of Tarski’s texts. In particular, I rebut some criticisms of my earlier attack on the fixed-domain exegesis and I offer a more detailed report of the textual evidence on the ...
openaire +1 more source
Models and Logical Consequence
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2013This paper deals with the adequacy of the model-theoretic definition of logical consequence. Logical consequence is commonly described as a necessary relation that can be determined by the form of the sentences involved. In this paper, necessity is assumed to be a metaphysical notion, and formality is viewed as a means to avoid dealing with complex ...
openaire +1 more source
2017
Contemporary philosophers generally conceive of consequence as necessary truth-preservation. They generally construe this necessity as logical, and operationalize it in substitutional, formal or model-theoretic terms as the absence of a counterexample.
openaire +2 more sources
Contemporary philosophers generally conceive of consequence as necessary truth-preservation. They generally construe this necessity as logical, and operationalize it in substitutional, formal or model-theoretic terms as the absence of a counterexample.
openaire +2 more sources