Results 101 to 110 of about 280 (142)

Neonatal research ethics after SUPPORT. [PDF]

Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 2018
Lantos JD.
europepmc   +1 more source

Uncertainty and computational complexity. [PDF]

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2019
Bossaerts P, Yadav N, Murawski C.
europepmc   +1 more source

Psychotherapy trainees' epistemological assumptions influencing research-practice integration. [PDF]

Res Psychother, 2019
Negri A, Andreoli G, Belotti L, Barazzetti A, Martin EH.   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

The long tail of COVID and the tale of long COVID: Diagnostic construction and the management of ignorance. [PDF]

Sociol Health Illn
Barker KK, Whooley O, Madden EF, Ahrend EE, Greene RN.   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Physics and proof theory.

Appl Math Comput, 2012
Paleo BW.
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

The problem of logical omniscience, I

SynthÈse, 1991
AbstractThis second exploration of the problem of logical omniscience uses a simple abstract model of a community of knowers, developed by theoretical computer scientists, to help sharpen the problem. Knowers are modelled by processors in a distributed system, such as a computer network, and knowledge is defined in terms of the information about the ...
Robert Stalnaker, Stalnaker Robert
exaly   +2 more sources

Logical omniscience, semantics, and models of belief

Computational Intelligence, 1988
Logical omniscience may be described (roughly) as the state of affairs in which an agent explicitly believes anything which is logically entailed by that agent's beliefs. It is widely agreed that humans are not logically omniscient, and that an adequate formal model of belief, coupled with a correct semantic theory, would not entail logical omniscience.
exaly   +2 more sources

SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF LOGICAL OMNISCIENCE

Nous-Supplement: Philosophical Issues, 2018
AbstractThis paper looks at three ways of addressing probabilism's implausible requirement of logical omniscience. The first and most common strategy says it's okay to require an ideally rational person to be logically omniscient. I argue that this view is indefensible on any interpretation of ‘ideally rational’.
Sinan Dogramaci
exaly   +2 more sources

Dealing with logical omniscience

Proceedings of the 11th conference on Theoretical aspects of rationality and knowledge - TARK '07, 2007
We examine four approaches for dealing with the logical omniscience problem and their potential applicability: the syntactic approach, awareness, algorithmic knowledge, and impossible possible worlds. Although in some settings these approaches are equi-expressive and can capture all epistemic states, in other settings of interest they are not.
Joseph Y. Halpern, Riccardo Pucella
openaire   +1 more source