Results 31 to 40 of about 3,259 (233)

A Wittgensteinian Antitheodicy

open access: yesReligions, 2022
Contrary to the majority of contemporary analytic philosophers of religion, James Sterba argues in his book Is a Good God Logically Possible? (2019) that Alvin Plantinga with his famous free will defense has not succeeded in solving the logical problem ...
Timo Koistinen
doaj   +1 more source

Sterba’s Logical Argument from Evil and the God Who Walks Away from Omelas

open access: yesReligions, 2022
The logical argument from evil, generally thought to have been defused by Alvin Plantinga’s free will defense, has been reinvigorated by James Sterba’s exposition and defense of a new version of the argument that draws on recent work in moral philosophy.
Erik J. Wielenberg
doaj   +1 more source

Examining the logical argument of the problem of evil from an African perspective

open access: yesReligious Studies, 2022
AbstractWe argue that the problem of evil, logically, stems from the unequal binary that characterizes the bivalent structure of Western discourses in the philosophy of religion. This structure pits God against the devil, but also the value of good against evil they are believed to represent.
Jonathan O. Chimakonam   +1 more
openaire   +2 more sources

A Comparison between Swinburne’s and Mutahari’s views on the Problem of Evil [PDF]

open access: yesپژوهشنامه فلسفه دین, 2014
The problem of evil, as raised by Mutahari and Swinburne, is one of the most important and complicated problems concerning belief in God and teleology of the world.
Hamidreza Ekandari Damaneh   +1 more
doaj   +1 more source

Defending the Free Will Defense: A Reply to Sterba

open access: yesReligions, 2022
James Sterba has recently argued that the free will defense fails to explain the compossibility of a perfect God and the amount and degree of moral evil that we see. I think he is mistaken about this.
Luis R. G. Oliveira
doaj   +1 more source

On a New Logical Problem of Evil

open access: yesFaith and Philosophy, 2015
J. L. Schellenberg has formulated two versions of a new logical argument from evil, an argument he claims to be immune to Alvin Plantinga’s free will defense. The first version assumes that God created the world to model God’s goodness, and the second to share with the world the good that already existed.
openaire   +3 more sources

Defeating the Problem of Evil with Evil

open access: yesTheoLogica
I argue that the creation and freely chosen salvation and everlasting bliss of even just one person is a greater good than any finite amount of evil and suffering.
Rad Miksa
doaj   +1 more source

The Problem of Evil and God’s Moral Standing: A Rejoinder to James Sterba

open access: yesReligions, 2022
This article is a rejoinder to James Sterba’s response to my previous article on the topic of his book, Is a Good God Logically Possible? Sterba argues that a good God is not logically possible given the amount of horrendous evil in the world. If God did
J. Brian Huffling
doaj   +1 more source

Organic Unities

open access: yesTheoLogica, 2019
The principle of organic unities is a metaphysical claim regarding the nature of moral value.  It states that the value of the whole is not equal to the summation of its parts.
Graham Floyd
doaj   +1 more source

A Dilemma for Sterba

open access: yesReligions, 2022
James Sterba argues that a good God is not logically possible. He argues that what he calls the Pauline Principle, which says that we should never do evil that good may come of it, implies that a good God would prevent horrendous evil consequences of ...
Bruce Russell
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy