Results 271 to 280 of about 81,479 (293)

Mendelian Randomization for Dermatology Research

JAMA Dermatology
This JAMA Network Insight describes the use of mendelian randomization, including key assumptions that must be met, in dermatology research.
Gary, Hettinger, David J, Margolis, Nandita, Mitra   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Mendelian Randomization Concerns

JAMA Psychiatry, 2018
Lin, Bochao Danae, Li, Yue, Luykx, Jurjen   +2 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Mendelian Randomization Concerns—Reply

JAMA Psychiatry, 2018
Fernando Pires, Hartwig, Maria Carolina, Borges, Jack, Bowden   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Appraising the causal role of smoking in multiple diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies

EBioMedicine, 2022
Susanna C Larsson, Stephen Burgess
exaly  

Testing and correcting for weak and pleiotropic instruments in two‐sample multivariable Mendelian randomization

Statistics in Medicine, 2021
Eleanor Sanderson, Wes Spiller, Jack Bowden   +2 more
exaly  

Mendelian Randomization

2015
Stephen Burgess, Simon G. Thompson
openaire   +1 more source

Kidney damage causally affects the brain cortical structure: A Mendelian randomization study

EBioMedicine, 2021
Xiayao Diao, Jiahao Cai, Jian Huang
exaly  

Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator

Genetic Epidemiology, 2016
Jack Bowden, George Davey Smith, Philip C Haycock   +2 more
exaly  

Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression

International Journal of Epidemiology, 2015
Stephen Burgess, Jack Bowden, George Davey Smith   +2 more
exaly  

Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method

European Journal of Epidemiology, 2017
Stephen Burgess, Simon G Thompson
exaly