Results 1 to 10 of about 358 (153)
Diverging Decisions? A Comparison of Jury Verdict Procedures [PDF]
Behavioral SciencesCourts have the capacity to structure juries’ decision making through the use of general verdicts with answers to written questions, special verdicts, and, in some countries, the requirement that juries provide reasons for their verdicts.
Kayla A. Burd +5 more
doaj +2 more sources
Judicial instructions on alibis: impact on mock jury decision-making. [PDF]
Psychiatr Psychol LawCloud Research (N = 320) participants read a hypothetical description of an arson and police investigation. They were randomly assigned to one of eight conditions in a 2 (presence of alibi evidence) X 2 (presence of prosecution evidence) X 2 (presence of judicial alibi instructions) between-participants design.
Allison M +3 more
europepmc +3 more sources
An Effect of Decision Rule on the Stability of Mock Juries' Verdicts
Korean Journal of Social & Personality Psychology, 2009 Eunro Lee
exaly +2 more sources
Students vs. Jurors: Responding to Enhanced Video Technology
Laws, 2014 This study investigated the influence of visual media technologies used in remote witness testimony, examining whether it is suitable to use students as mock jurors when measuring the impact of new technologies.
Meredith Rossner +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Mock Jury Simulations: Adapting to Online Methodologies [PDF]
, 2022 Trial by jury has long been considered an essential feature of a fair and just criminal justice system in England and Wales. Promoting lay participation within justice discourse, the jury system is upheld as a cornerstone of democratic due process. However, due to safeguards implemented under the Contempt of Court Act (1981), research within the jury ...
openaire +2 more sources
A Neutrosophic Functional-Analytic Model for Urban Sculpture Design Quality Evaluation [PDF]
Neutrosophic Sets and SystemsUrban sculpture design must reconcile aesthetics, structural integrity, site context, public engagement, safety, and sustainability under evaluator disagreement and incomplete information. Classical and fuzzy methods compress ambiguity into single-valued
Bingbing Diao
doaj +1 more source
Cogent Psychology, 2019 A large body of research has focused on legal decision-making. However, few studies have tested the impact on evidence processing of the intimate conviction (IC) instruction, a decision rule based on impression formation that is used in mixed courts of ...
Catherine Esnard, Rafaele Dumas
doaj +1 more source
The effect of victim intoxication and crime type on mock jury decision-making
Psychology, Crime & Law, 2022 Alcohol intoxication is a common feature in crime, yet jurors often possess little understanding of how alcohol affects eyewitness memory. Furthermore, jurors are often blind to biases about different crimes that affect their interpretation of eyewitness evidence.
Erica Martin, Lauren A. Monds
openaire +2 more sources
The provenance of what is proven: exploring (mock) jury deliberation in Scottish rape trials [PDF]
Journal of Law and Society, 2021 AbstractThis article presents findings from the largest research study of the nature of mock jury deliberations in rape cases undertaken in the UK to date – and the first such study to be undertaken in the Scottish context. The study found considerable evidence of the expression of problematic attitudes towards rape complainers.
Chalmers, James +2 more
openaire +3 more sources
On the “Mockness” of Mock Juries: Real versus Mock Juries as Conversational Forms
International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2019 This paper is an analysis of real versus simulated, or “mock,” juries. It is specifically focused on similarities and differences between the two forms of group-based deliberation with respect to the content and organization of deliberative talk. Via analysis of transcript from six deliberations—two real and four mock—the value of mock juries as an ...
openaire +1 more source