Results 41 to 50 of about 7,785 (199)
Norms and Significance in Ignorance. Reply to Duncan Pritchard
ABSTRACT This is a reply to Duncan Pritchard's response to my critique of his normative account of ignorance. Pritchard suggests that I take a Normative Condition on board in my own account of ignorance. Pritchard's suggestion has drastic revisionary and deflationary implications for how we use words like “ignorance” and “ignorant”.
Rik Peels
wiley +1 more source
The Laws of Natural Deduction in Inference by DNA Computer
We present a DNA-based implementation of reaction system with molecules encoding elements of the propositional logic, that is, propositions and formulas.
Łukasz Rogowski, Petr Sosík
doaj +1 more source
Methods in Psychological Research [PDF]
Psychologists collect empirical data with various methods for different reasons. These diverse methods have their strengths as well as weaknesses. Nonetheless, it is possible to rank them in terms of different critieria.
Chow, Siu L.
core
Abstract A new argument is offered which proceeds through epistemic possibility (for all S knows, p), cutting a trail from modality to Millianism, the controversial thesis that the semantic content of a proper name is simply its bearer. New definitions are provided for various epistemic modal notions.
Nathan Salmón
wiley +1 more source
Présentation de La Certitude de G. E. Moore
The first part of Certainty analyzes several assertions such as "I am standing up, I have clothes on, I have in my hand some sheets of paper", etc. Moore insists that, in spite of their contingent character, they may be known to be true with certainty ...
Bernard Drigout
doaj +1 more source
A Meta-Logic of Inference Rules: Syntax [PDF]
This work was intended to be an attempt to introduce the meta-language for working with multiple-conclusion inference rules that admit asserted propositions along with the rejected propositions.
Citkin, Alex
core +2 more sources
Abstract I outline a novel counterexample to the principle of belief revision, Anticipation: if both learning e$e$ and learning not‐e$e$ would render belief in p$p$ unjustified, you cannot now be justified in believing p$p$. If I am right, not only is the leading theory of belief revision false, so are various recently proposed weakenings.
Joshua Edward Pearson
wiley +1 more source
ABSTRACT Many of those memorialized around us in statues are wrongdoers, and so we are often called to consider whether we should take down those statues. Some of those statutes are memorialized for reasons now taken to be wrong; others are memorialized not for but rather despite their wrongdoing. How should we consider those latter cases? One tempting
Craig K. Agule
wiley +1 more source
What if God commanded something horrible? A pragmatics-based defence of divine command metaethics [PDF]
The objection of horrible commands claims that divine command metaethics is doomed to failure because it is committed to the extremely counterintuitive assumption that torture of innocents, rape, and murder would be morally obligatory if God commanded ...
Kremers, Philipp
core
Abstract Advocates of longtermism point out that interventions which focus on improving the prospects of people in the very far future will, in expectation, bring about an astronomical amount of good (or agent‐neutral value). As such, longtermists claim we have compelling moral reason to engage in long‐term interventions.
Emma Curran
wiley +1 more source

