Results 11 to 20 of about 1,058,703 (292)
A Problem for Moral Naturalism: Outsourcing Moral Judgments
Moral Naturalism is the view that moral judgments aim at describing moral facts and that these are ordinary garden-variety natural facts. Moral Naturalism has trouble accounting for the intuition that we cannot outsource moral judgments, i.e., we cannot ...
Rafael Vogelmann
doaj +2 more sources
Neural underpinnings of morality judgment and moral aesthetic judgment [PDF]
AbstractMorality judgment usually refers to the evaluation of moral behavior`s ability to affect others` interests and welfare, while moral aesthetic judgment often implies the appraisal of moral behavior's capability to provide aesthetic pleasure. Both are based on the behavioral understanding.
Qiuping Cheng +5 more
openaire +5 more sources
A reason-based explanation for moral dumbfounding [PDF]
The moral dumbfounding phenomenon for harmless taboo violations is often cited as a critical piece of empirical evidence motivating anti-rationalist models of moral judgment and decision-making.
Matthew L. Stanley +2 more
doaj +3 more sources
The impact of socio-demographic attributes on moral judgment of Japanese population
Several factors influence people’s ability to make moral judgments. Apart from manipulating experimental conditions, this association can be explored in terms of socio-demographic attributes such as the social status and background of individuals.
Yachun Qian +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Maldynia as a Moral Judgment? [PDF]
> Why then 'tis none to you; for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. To me it is a prison. Hamlet Act 2, scene 2, 239–251. We are dismayed to learn that “maldynia” has now entered Pain Medicine's lexicon [1] due in large part to the efforts of the American Academy of Pain Medicine to categorize pain “on a neurobiologic basis
John, Quintner +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC) [PDF]
Observed variability and complexity of judgments of “right” and “wrong” cannot be readily accounted for within extant approaches to understanding moral judgment. In response to this challenge, we present a novel perspective on categorization in moral judgment.
Cillian McHugh +3 more
openaire +4 more sources
Counterfactual choices and moral judgments in children
When making moral judgments of past actions, adults often think counterfactually about what could have been done differently. Considerable evidence suggests that counterfactual thinking emerges around age 6, but it remains unknown how this development ...
Jonathan Redshaw +7 more
core +1 more source
Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment [PDF]
AbstractWhile there is much evidence for the influence of automatic emotional responses on moral judgment, the roles of reflection and reasoning remain uncertain. In Experiment 1, we induced subjects to be more reflective by completing the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) prior to responding to moral dilemmas.
Joseph M. Paxton +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Moral perfectionism and moral values, virtues, and judgments: Further investigations [PDF]
In a first psychological investigation of moral perfectionism, Yang, Stoeber, and Wang (2015) adapted items from the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale to differentiate perfectionistic personal moral standards and concern over moral mistakes ...
Stoeber, Joachim, Yang, Hongfei
core +1 more source
With a clean conscience: cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. [PDF]
Theories of moral judgment have long emphasized reasoning and conscious thought while downplaying the role of intuitive and contextual influences. However, recent research has demonstrated that incidental feelings of disgust can influence moral judgments
core +2 more sources

