Results 71 to 80 of about 23,750 (198)
Three studies (total N = 1486) investigated how inferences about a person's current moral character guide forecasts about that person's future moral character and future misfortunes, and tested several plausible moderating variables.
Cindel J M White +2 more
doaj +1 more source
No harm, no foul: The outcome bias in ethical judgments [PDF]
We present six studies demonstrating that outcome information biases ethical judgments of others' ethically-questionable behaviors. In particular, we show that the same behaviors produce more ethical condemnation when they happen to produce bad rather ...
Don A. Moore +2 more
core
Tolerance of Muslim beliefs and practices: Age related differences and context effects [PDF]
Tolerant judgments of Muslims’ political rights and dissenting beliefs and practices by ethnic Dutch adolescents (12–18 years) were examined. Participants (N = 632) made judgments of different types of behaviors and different contexts in an experimental ...
Slooter, Luuk +3 more
core +1 more source
Moral Disengagement in Legal Judgments [PDF]
: We investigated the role of moral disengagement in a legally‐relevant judgment in this theoretically‐driven empirical analysis. Moral disengagement is a social‐cognitive phenomenon through which people reason their way toward harming others, presenting
core +1 more source
Could judgments about others' moral character be changed under group pressure produced by human and virtual agents? In Study 1 (N = 103), participants first judged targets' moral character privately and two weeks later in the presence of real humans ...
Konrad Bocian +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Improving moral judgments: philosophical considerations
In contemporary moral psychology, an often-heard claim is that knowing how we make moral judgments can help us make better moral judgments. Discussions about moral development and improvement are often framed in terms of the question of which mental ...
Kalis, A. +4 more
core +1 more source
Rethinking Moral Judgment: after Dual-Process theory
The Dual Process Hypothesis of Moral Judgment (DPHMJ) posits that some moral judgments (deontological moral judgments) are fast and emotion-based, while others (utilitarian moral judgments) are slow, as a result of deliberate reasoning processes.
Julia F. Christensen, Antoni Gomila
doaj +1 more source
On Disgust and Moral Judgments: A Review
While there is a continuing debate on whether cognitive or emotional mechanisms underlie moral judgments, recent studies have illustrated that emotions—particularly disgust—play a prominent role in moral reasoning.
Cristina-Elena Ivan
doaj +1 more source
How Power Affects Moral Judgments [PDF]
People in powerful positions often make decisions that have moral implications. Lammers and Stapel (2009) proposed that high power increases deontological (rule-based vs. utilitarian or outcome-based) moral reasoning.
Zheng, Mufan
core
In this paper, I have tried to answer, by an analytic-critical method, to this question: What is the relation between moral intuition and justifying moral judgments from Moore's viewpoint?
Aliakbar Abdulabadi
doaj

