Results 81 to 90 of about 3,578 (181)
Neuroeconomics and neuroethics are subfields of cognitive neuroscience that address the neural correlates of distinct, although strongly intertwined, facets of decision-making.
Maria Arioli, Nicola Canessa
doaj +1 more source
Neuroeconomics: more than inspiration, less than revolution
Gul and Pesendorfer (2008) argue that neuroeconomics is evidentially and explanatorily irrelevant to economics, because neuroeconomics and economics ask different questions and utilize different abstractions.
N. Emrah Aydinonat
core +1 more source
Post-traumatic stress and decision-making: research prospects in the paradigm of neuroeconomics
In the modern world, humans risk exposure to traumatic events such as major stress, terrorism, diseases, catastrophes a threat to a persons’ life or health, sexual assault, military experience etc. After being exposed to those, a posttraumatic
O.N. Bogolyubova, A.N. Shestakova
doaj +1 more source
Humans and animals can flexibly choose their actions based on different information, ranging from objective states of the environment (e.g., apples are bigger than cherries) to subjective preferences (e.g., cherries are tastier than apples).
Miguel Barretto-Garcia +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Neuroeconomics: A Critique of 'Neuroeconomics: A Critical Reconsideration'
Some economists believe that the work of neuroeconomists threatens the theory of economics. Glenn Harrison’s paper “Neuroeconomics: A Critical Reconsideration” attempts to set the score, though the points he makes are hidden behind the fumes of his anger
Stanton, Angela A.
core +2 more sources
Neuroeconomics of prosocial behavior : the compassionate egoist /
"This summary of recent research in neuroeconomics aims to explain how and why a person can sometimes be generous, helpful, and cooperative, yet other times behave in a self-interested and/or exploitative manner.
Declerck, Carolyn,author. +1 more
core
The following is a set of reading notes on, and questions for, the Neuroeconomics enterprise. My reading of neuroscience evidence seems to be at odds with basic conceptions routinely assumed in the Neuroeconomics literature.
Ortmann, Andreas
core
Neuroeconomics: Constructing identity
The paper asks whether neuroeconomics will make instrumental use of neuroscience to adjudicate existing disputes in economics or be more seriously transformed by neuroscience in ways that might transform economics.
Davis, John B. +2 more
core +1 more source
Anger, Rationality and Neuroeconomics. [PDF]
This paper employs neurobehavioral and psychological evidence to argue that anger is an emotion arising from significant cognitive processing, one that, in relation to economic decision-making, may be subtly mediated by many factors (including intentions).
openaire +2 more sources
Decision-Making: A Neuroeconomic Perspective
This article introduces and discusses from a philosophical point of view the nascent field of neuroeconomics, which is the study of neural mechanisms involved in decision-making and their economic significance.
Hardy-Vallee, Benoit
core

